See, if you don’t have that standard, or even believe in one,
you can’t discuss any issue,
as all you are expressing is an opinion,
and your opinion is no better than anyone else’s that isn’t based on a fixed, unchanging, and objective standard.
That standard, the standard of moral absolutes, the standard of absolutes in right and wrong,
exists and is discoverable in the Bible.
Reject it, and you have no place to stand in order to assert anything other than an opinion that isn’t any more truthful than anyone else’s.
Actually the opposite is true, one can discuss any issue, in any manner.
Why is an opinion that is based on a fixed, unchanging and objective standard, any better than one’s opinion, when discussing such topics as politics, religion, faith, morals, spirituality, etc? All that means, is one’s arguement, faith, beliefs and so on, are relative to that standard, not that that standard is correct.
If it were the way you say it is, then we probably would all be believing the same thing after enough time had passed.