Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Homosexual Assault in the Military
Family Reserch Council ^ | Peter Sprigg

Posted on 10/15/2010 11:18:25 AM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan

Homosexual Assault in the Military


Executive Summary

A Family Research Council analysis of publicly available documents-the Pentagon's own report on sexual assault in the military for Fiscal Year 2009, and published decisions from military courts of appeals over the last decade and a half-have shown that there is already a significant problem of homosexual misconduct in the military. This problem can only become worse if the current law is repealed and homosexuals are openly welcomed (and even granted special protections) within the military, as homosexual activists are demanding.

Rates of Homosexual Assault in the Military Are Disproportionately High

Homosexual activist groups themselves have admitted that less than three percent of Americans are homosexual or bisexual.

FRC has reviewed the "case synopses" of all 1,643 reports of sexual assault reported by the four branches of the military for Fiscal Year 2009 (October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009). Our startling finding was that over eight percent (8.2%) of all military sexual assault cases were homosexual in nature. This suggests that homosexuals in the military are about three times more likely to commit sexual assaults than heterosexuals are, relative to their numbers.

Lack of Privacy Leads to Sexual Assaults

FRC and other supporters of the current law have pointed out the risks involved in having servicemembers share living quarters, showers, and bathrooms with persons of the same sex who may be sexually attracted to them. This concern is borne out by many of the case synopses reported by the Pentagon. The most common type of homosexual assault is one in which the offender fondles or performs oral sex upon a sleeping victim. Assaults upon victims who are intoxicated are also common.

Many Discharges of Homosexuals are for Sexual Assault

Advocates of open homosexuality in the military often lament the fact that several thousand members of the military have been discharged under the 1993 law since its enactment. However, what they fail to note is that many of those discharges are actually for sexual assaults.


Court Records Reveal Shocking Cases of Homosexual Assault

Published decisions of military courts (available on the legal search engine Lexis) give even more detail about homosexual assaults in the military. For example:

Conclusion

The military already has a serious problem with sexual assault by homosexuals. If the current law against homosexuality in the military is overturned, the problem of same-sex sexual assault in the military is sure to increase.

Allowing open homosexuality in the military would do nothing to enhance the readiness or effectiveness of our armed forces. On the contrary, it would clearly damage them-in part because it would increase the already serious problem of homosexual assault in the military.

Download the full paper [PDF]


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: cultureofcorruption; homosexualagenda; lavendermafia; militay; obama; palin; rape; sexualassault; ussoldiers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last
Has Homosexuality Always Been Incompatible With Military Service?
1 posted on 10/15/2010 11:18:28 AM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

Well I suppose the military will have to increase the budget for drapes and strange european food. And I guess the commisary will need some europop for the dance floor.


2 posted on 10/15/2010 11:20:36 AM PDT by utherdoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
“The most common type of homosexual assault is one in which the offender fondles or performs oral sex upon a sleeping victim. Assaults upon victims who are intoxicated are also common.”

There should be NO SURPISE about THIS.

Gay males are promiscuous. Someone sleeping is a sitting duck. WHY do you think soldiers were asking for RELIGIOUS OBJECTION to be housed with them? They do not want to be RAPED, HARRASSED or ATTACKED by these PERVERTS. All these perverts should be thrown out. ALL OF THEM.

I don't care how “honorably” they “serve”. Their negative behavior and how their perversion affects morale far outweighs any benefit of having a living breathing pervert there.

3 posted on 10/15/2010 11:22:35 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

“Lack of Privacy Leads to Sexual Assaults”

This is the real problem. Supporters of gays in the military have never shared their bedroom or shower with 55 other men. I have, and even with straight guys who practice good hygiene it’s tense.


4 posted on 10/15/2010 11:25:29 AM PDT by Spok (Free Range Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

“The first men dignosed with IDS reported an averge of one thousnd partners during their lives. Those who hve reserched the HIV-IDS epidemic have noted that some homosexul males actully hve five to ten sexul encounters in single night.” —Dr. Richrd Fittzgibbons


5 posted on 10/15/2010 11:27:00 AM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan (I am defiantly proud of being part of the Religious Right in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Throw all the queers out of the military with a dishonorable discharge and give them a bus ticket to S.F.


6 posted on 10/15/2010 11:27:16 AM PDT by thethirddegree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nmh

If we were dealing in reality,
these people couldn’t serve in the military
because of their psychiatric disorder.


7 posted on 10/15/2010 11:29:04 AM PDT by MrB (The difference between a (de)humanist and a Satanist is that the latter knows who he's working for.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

Nazi roots: They perceived themselves not merely as masculine, but as a breed of men superior in masculine qualities even to heterosexuals. The Community of the Special (CS) asserted that male homosexuality was the foundation of all nation-states and that male homosexuals represented an elite strata of human society. The CS fashioned itself as a modern incarnation of the warrior cults of ancient Greece. Modeling themselves after the military heroes of Sparta, Thebes and Crete, the members of the CS were ultra-masculine, male-supremacist and pederastic (devoted to man/boy sex). Brand said in Der Eigene that he wanted men who “thirst for a revival of Greek times and Hellenic standards of beauty after centuries of Christian barbarism.”


8 posted on 10/15/2010 11:29:52 AM PDT by donna (The fruits of Feminism: Angry fathers, bitter mothers, fat kids and political correctness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donna
While Adolf Hitler is today recognized as the central figure of Nazism, he was a less important player when the Nazi machine was first assembled. Its first leader was Ernst Roehm. Homosexual historian Frank Rector writes that "Hitler was, to a substantial extent, Roehm's protegé" (Rector:80). Roehm had been a captain in the German army. Hitler had been a mere corporal. After World War I, Roehm was highly placed in the underground nationalist movement that plotted to overthrow the Weimar government and worked to subvert it through assassinations and terrorism. In The Order of the Death's Head, author Heinz Hohne writes that Roehm met Hitler at a meeting of a socialist terrorist group called the Iron Fist and "saw in Hitler the demagogue he required to mobilize mass support for his secret army" (Hohne:20). Roehm, who had joined the German Worker's Party before Hitler, worked with him to take over the fledgling organization. With Roehm's backing, Hitler became the first president of the party in 1921 (ibid.:21) and changed its name to the National Socialist German Worker's Party. Soon after, Rossbach's Storm Troopers, the SA, became its military arm. In his classic Nazi history, The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich, author William Shirer describes Roehm as "a stocky, bull-necked, piggish-eyed, scar- faced professional soldier...[and] like so many of the early Nazis, a homosexual" (Shirer:64). Rector writes:

Was not the most outstanding, most notorious, of all homosexuals the celebrated Nazi leader Ernst Ro[e]hm, the virile and manly chief of the SA, the du buddy of Adolf Hitler from the beginning of his political career? Hitler's rise had in fact depended upon Ro[e]hm and everyone knew it. Ro[e]hm's gay fun and games were certainly no secret; his amorous forays to gay bars and gay Turkish baths were riotous. Whatever anti-homosexual sentiments may have been expressed by straight Nazis were more than offset by the reality of highly visible, spectacular, gay-loving Ro[e]hm. If there were occasional ominous rumblings and grumblings about "all those queers" in the SA and Movement, and some anti-gay flare-ups, homosexual Nazis felt more-or-less secure in the lap of the Party. After all, the National Socialist Party member who wielded the greatest power aside from Hitler was Ro[e]hm (Rector:50f).

Betraying his roots in the "Butch" faction of the German "gay rights" movement, Roehm viewed homosexuality as the basis for a new society. Louis Snyder writes that Roehm "projected a social order in which homosexuality would be regarded as a human behavior pattern of high repute...he flaunted his homosexuality in public and insisted that his cronies do the same. What was needed, Roehm believed, was a proud and arrogant lot who could brawl, carouse, smash windows, kill and slaughter for the hell of it. Straights, in his eyes, were not as adept in such behavior as practicing homosexuals" (Snyder:55). "The principle function of this army-like organization," writes historian Thomas Fuchs, "was beating up anyone who opposed the Nazis, and Hitler believed this was a job best undertaken by homosexuals" (Fuchs:48f).

The favorite meeting place of the SA was a "gay" bar in Munich called the Bratwurstglockl where Roehm kept a reserved table (Hohne:82). This was the same tavern where some of the earliest formative meetings of the Nazi Party had been held (Rector:69). At the Bratwurstglockl, Roehm and associates-Edmund Heines, Karl Ernst, Ernst's partner Captain Rohrbein, Captain Petersdorf, Count Ernst Helldorf and the rest-would meet to plan and strategize. These were the men who orchestrated the Nazi campaign of intimidation and terror. All of them were homosexual (Heiden:371).

Indeed, homosexuality was all that qualified many of these men for their positions in the SA. Heinrich Himmler would later complain of this: "Does it not constitute a danger to the Nazi movement if it can be said that Nazi leaders are chosen for sexual reasons?" (Gallo:57). Himmler was not so much opposed to homosexuality itself as to the fact that non- qualified people were given high rank based on their homosexual relations with Roehm and others. For example, SA Obergruppenfuhrer (Lieutenant General) Karl Ernst, a militant homosexual, had been a hotel doorman and a waiter before joining the SA. "Karl Ernst is not yet 35," writes Gallo, "he commands 250,000 men...he is simply a sadist, a common thug, transformed into a responsible official" (ibid.:50f).

This strange brand of nepotism was a hallmark of the SA. By 1933 the SA had grown far larger than the German army, yet the Vikingkorps (Officers' Corps) remained almost exclusively homosexual. "Roehm, as the head of 2,500,000 Storm Troops," writes historian H.R. Knickerbocker, "had surrounded himself with a staff of perverts. His chiefs, men of rank of Gruppenfuhrer or Obergruppenfuhrer, commanding units of several hundred thousand Storm Troopers, were almost without exception homosexuals. Indeed, unless a Storm Troop officer were homosexual he had no chance of advancement" (Knickerbocker:55).

Homosexuality in the Nazi Party
9 posted on 10/15/2010 11:35:13 AM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan (I am defiantly proud of being part of the Religious Right in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan; 185JHP; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

10 posted on 10/15/2010 11:36:08 AM PDT by DJ MacWoW (If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh
I don't get it.

It is simple for me.

I don't like/agree with queers and they insist on trying to make me accept them.

That's a sure way to get seriously hurt ... I'm old and weakened ... I don't fight fair.

forewarned.

11 posted on 10/15/2010 11:40:24 AM PDT by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
If this ruling by yet another black-robed tyrant stands, we will have crossed a line which will lead to disaster for our nation. Whether that disaster comes from inside or outside our nation remains to be seen. But I've said for a long time that letting homos serve with impunity would be a trigger event, and I still believe that.

Scouts Out! Cavalry Ho!

12 posted on 10/15/2010 11:41:45 AM PDT by wku man (Steel yourselves, patriots, and be ready. Won't be long now....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Our startling finding was that over eight percent (8.2%) of all military sexual assault cases were homosexual in nature.

Yeah, 8.2% that were REPORTED.

How many victims do you think decided to just keep quiet rather than admit they'd been raped by a queer?

If we'd just spend half the resources and energy to curing homosexuality that we do trying to convince people it's normal, we wouldn't have this problem at all.

13 posted on 10/15/2010 11:41:55 AM PDT by South Hawthorne (In Memory of my Dear Friend Henry Lee II)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: knarf

“I don’t get it.
It is simple for me.

I don’t like/agree with queers and they insist on trying to make me accept them.

That’s a sure way to get seriously hurt ... I’m old and weakened ... I don’t fight fair.

forewarned.”

No problem with that here!

I salute YOU!


14 posted on 10/15/2010 11:43:57 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

Quite the eye opener. Thanks for the post


15 posted on 10/15/2010 11:44:06 AM PDT by fml
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: utherdoul

If this becomes the norm any GI who wants too should be allowed to walk away regardless of his enlistment/ re-enlistment agreements with no penalty.


16 posted on 10/15/2010 11:44:36 AM PDT by Waco (From Seward to Sarah)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MrB

“If we were dealing in reality,
these people couldn’t serve in the military
because of their psychiatric disorder.”

Exactly!

Now we have humanism mistaken for Christianity and more molestations than ever. It’s sick.


17 posted on 10/15/2010 11:45:15 AM PDT by nmh (Intelligent people recognize Intelligent Design (God).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

Will unless you model your military on the Spartans or the Sacred Band of Thebes, yes.

Maybe the answer is to form all Homosexual units.


18 posted on 10/15/2010 11:45:46 AM PDT by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozak
Darn.

Will WELL unless you model your military on the Spartans or the Sacred Band of Thebes, yes. Maybe the answer is to form all Homosexual units.
19 posted on 10/15/2010 11:48:25 AM PDT by Kozak (USA 7/4/1776 to 1/20/2009 Reqiescat in Pace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

Make no mistake, this radical left has no model for our military other than demoralizing it, weakening it, and just plain f**king it over.


20 posted on 10/15/2010 11:51:13 AM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan (I am defiantly proud of being part of the Religious Right in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: nmh

Did the same, and I agree with you.

If this goes through, I believe that each individual should be allowed/required to reevaluate their enlistment contract.
If you change your side, why should I not have the chance to change mine?

How we’ll start the new military after that should be interesting...


21 posted on 10/15/2010 11:52:49 AM PDT by benewton
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: nmh
“The most common type of homosexual assault is one in which the offender fondles or performs oral sex upon a sleeping victim. Assaults upon victims who are intoxicated are also common.”

The assailant should have his/her neck broken.

22 posted on 10/15/2010 11:52:55 AM PDT by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: donna

the 300. Not really good heroes.


23 posted on 10/15/2010 11:53:36 AM PDT by huldah1776
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: May 26, 2010
CONTACT: J.P. Duffy or Darin Miller, (866) FRC-NEWS

Homosexuals In Military Three Times More Likely to Commit Sexual Assault Than Heterosexuals


WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Family Research Council today released an analysis of publicly available documents which shows that homosexuals in the military are three times more likely to commit sexual assaults than heterosexuals are, relative to their numbers. This problem would only increase if the current law against homosexuality in the military, enacted in 1993, were to be overturned, as President Obama and Democratic leaders in Congress are attempting to do this week.

The FRC analysis, conducted by Senior Fellow for Policy Studies Peter Sprigg, was based on the Pentagon's own annual report on sexual assault in the military for Fiscal Year 2009, and on published decisions from military courts of appeals over the last decade and a half.

A review of the "case synopses" of all 1,643 reports of sexual assault reported by the four branches of the military for Fiscal Year 2009 (October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009) found that over eight percent (8.2%) of all military sexual assault cases were homosexual in nature. Yet homosexual activist groups themselves have admitted that less than three percent of Americans (2.8% of men and 1.4% of women) are homosexual or bisexual.

"Taken together, these figures suggest that homosexuals in the military are about three times more likely to commit sexual assaults than heterosexuals are," noted Sprigg.   "Concerns about privacy when homosexuals share facilities like showers and sleeping quarters with heterosexuals are well grounded," he added.

"The report found that the most common type of homosexual assault is one in which the offender fondles or performs oral sex upon a sleeping victim."

"If open homosexuality is permitted in the military, these numbers will only increase," Sprigg warned. "The numbers of homosexuals in the military would grow, the threat of discharge for homosexual conduct would be eliminated, and protected class status for homosexuals would make victims hesitant to report assaults and make commanders hesitant to punish them."

"Congress should carefully consider these serious risks before short-circuiting the process of studying this issue.  Congress should heed the advice of the four service chiefs who once again today urged Congress to back down until the military review is finished," Sprigg concluded. Source: Homosexuals In Military Three Times More Likely to Commit Sexual Assault Than Heterosexuals

24 posted on 10/15/2010 11:53:42 AM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan (I am defiantly proud of being part of the Religious Right in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan; utherdoul; nmh; Spok; MrB

I am in the process of asking the U.S. Naval Institute a third time for any sort of response concerning why they will not publish letters of substance regarding “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell”. So far arguments have been limited to a false dichotomy about social experimentation supported by emotional expositions. If not mine below, then this professional journal should allow other substantive arguments from people with superior wordsmithing skills, which require people of intellectual courage to engage in meaningful discussions.

Mr. Goldich’s and Mr. Webb’s discussion of “Don’t Ask Don’t Tell” appears attenuated. Repeal means institutionalizing threats to the religious liberty of Chaplains and other service members. Homosexuality must also estrange itself from medicine and science in order to fabricate a social justice issue for the debate. Finally, arguments maintaining that open homosexuality will not hurt morale declaim the character of military operations as affirmed in the current law.

Jewish, Christian, and Muslim believers find their Constitutionally guaranteed freedom of religion threatened by the repeal. For many followers of desert religions, who send their pastors into the chaplaincy and their believers into military service, homosexual behavior is unacceptable. Instead it resides among the myriad sins entrapping humanity that lives in a fallen world with a fallen nature.

For them foundational scholarship concludes homosexual relationships separate believers from God. The Old Testament, holy to “People of the Book”, speaks of the character, identity, and purpose of God in a manner, which continuously addresses homosexuality. God is spoken of as masculine, and all humans become feminine in relation to Him. In addition to creating all things, God created the single institution of heterosexual marriage as the earthy manifestation of the relationship of absolute unity and love He seeks with each person. Classical Semitic theology emphasizes searching for and identifying with God in the spiritual dimension. Therefore, worthwhile actions and thoughts are those which reinforce the faith commitment to a spiritual relationship. Spiritual life for tens of millions of Jewish, Christian, and Muslim believers means any subsequent reasoning from scriptures must proceed from that basic understanding in order to be a valid derivation. Therefore after repeal, when believers reject homosexuality in counseling rolls and normal life activities, these people reside outside Constitutional boundaries guaranteeing religious freedom to become guilty by popular acclamation of at least cultural prejudice.

The transformation of homosexuality into a cultural prejudice phenomenon finds foundational medical and scientific credibility in the 1973 decision by the American Psychiatric Association (APA) to remove homosexuality as a mental disorder from its Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM). Removal followed a two year campaign Newsweek described as ongoing disruptive, chaotic attacks on psychiatrists and physiologists. Yet throughout these disruptive attacks, no academic papers were presented at conferences refuting any research previously done. Eventually onslaughts forced sufficient abstentions and apprehensive responses for a third of APA’s 17,000 plus membership to approve removal.

After this decision a new task force was established to ensure perpetual sanctity for the APA action. No research papers would again arise to confirm initial therapy success rates of 30% to 60 %, substantiating that 7 of 10 homosexuals could eventually walk away from the lifestyle forever. This task force would set peer review standards mandating pre-ordained theses, acceptable flexibility in research design definitions, and acceptable human data points. Psychology and Psychiatry chose to relinquish scientific rigor for popular societal and political acclaim. Therefore, Mr. Webb safely references reports that unit cohesion and combat effectiveness would be unaffected, and concludes homosexuality is equivalent to race.

Mr. Webb questions “why should off-base consensual sex during off-duty hours be of any concern to commanders?” Yet the current law recognizes maintaining high morale, good order and discipline, and unit cohesion requires extraordinary restrictions for environments characterized by sacrificial, primitive and intimate relations. Military operations to protect this country are not conducted in garrison, and offer no opportunities for off duty or private time. Operating military personnel, locked in small task oriented units, forward deploy, and repeatedly face incredible stress if not actual combat. These environments are inherently chaotic and brittle, and can only be overcome by totalitarian leadership unimaginable in pacific situations. At this point Psychology and Psychiatry should make a meaningful contribution. However, their 1973 decision enables base antidotal politics to dominate, and allows critical issues to be trivialized into an amendment to defense authorization.

This debate should not veer into secular humanist social justice. The primary issues to consider should be Constitutional religious freedom, and whether any mental disorders can be tolerated within the exceptional human structures needed to defeat enemies unconcerned with social engineering.


25 posted on 10/15/2010 11:53:50 AM PDT by Retain Mike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE: May 26, 2010
CONTACT: J.P. Duffy or Darin Miller, (866) FRC-NEWS

Homosexuals In Military Three Times More Likely to Commit Sexual Assault Than Heterosexuals


WASHINGTON, D.C. - The Family Research Council today released an analysis of publicly available documents which shows that homosexuals in the military are three times more likely to commit sexual assaults than heterosexuals are, relative to their numbers. This problem would only increase if the current law against homosexuality in the military, enacted in 1993, were to be overturned, as President Obama and Democratic leaders in Congress are attempting to do this week.

The FRC analysis, conducted by Senior Fellow for Policy Studies Peter Sprigg, was based on the Pentagon's own annual report on sexual assault in the military for Fiscal Year 2009, and on published decisions from military courts of appeals over the last decade and a half.

A review of the "case synopses" of all 1,643 reports of sexual assault reported by the four branches of the military for Fiscal Year 2009 (October 1, 2008 through September 30, 2009) found that over eight percent (8.2%) of all military sexual assault cases were homosexual in nature. Yet homosexual activist groups themselves have admitted that less than three percent of Americans (2.8% of men and 1.4% of women) are homosexual or bisexual.

"Taken together, these figures suggest that homosexuals in the military are about three times more likely to commit sexual assaults than heterosexuals are," noted Sprigg.   "Concerns about privacy when homosexuals share facilities like showers and sleeping quarters with heterosexuals are well grounded," he added.

"The report found that the most common type of homosexual assault is one in which the offender fondles or performs oral sex upon a sleeping victim."

"If open homosexuality is permitted in the military, these numbers will only increase," Sprigg warned. "The numbers of homosexuals in the military would grow, the threat of discharge for homosexual conduct would be eliminated, and protected class status for homosexuals would make victims hesitant to report assaults and make commanders hesitant to punish them."

"Congress should carefully consider these serious risks before short-circuiting the process of studying this issue.  Congress should heed the advice of the four service chiefs who once again today urged Congress to back down until the military review is finished," Sprigg concluded. Source: Homosexuals In Military Three Times More Likely to Commit Sexual Assault Than Heterosexuals

26 posted on 10/15/2010 11:53:56 AM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan (I am defiantly proud of being part of the Religious Right in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

Homosexuals always want us to believe we can’t get along without them. Real life doesn’t work that way, especially in the military where there are hundreds, if not thousands, of people ready to step in and do any job a Homosexual might be doing.


27 posted on 10/15/2010 12:01:57 PM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

Damn, I’m glad I’ve long retired from there. What a different world it is now...


28 posted on 10/15/2010 12:04:25 PM PDT by ScottinVA (The West needs to act NOW to aggressively treat its metastasizing islaminoma!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

“If homosexuals become a protected class within the military, victims will be afraid to report incidents of homosexual assault and commanders will be afraid to punish them, lest they be accused of “discrimination” or “homophobia.””

This brings to mind something I read a number of years ago about the increase in suicides brought upon young men whom were Homosexually assaulted. Men take their masculinity seriously, and blame themselves even of forced sexual encounters. They believe they could have done something to stop the assault, and consider themselves as failures for not stopping even the most aggressive.

I never read about that in current discussions of this matter, or perhaps I’ve missed it.

The potential for increased suicide exists if Homosexuality is permitted in our military, as well the military would be forced to conscript as the all Volunteer system would break down.


29 posted on 10/15/2010 12:05:11 PM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: huldah1776

I thought about that, too.


30 posted on 10/15/2010 12:24:00 PM PDT by donna (The fruits of Feminism: Angry fathers, bitter mothers, fat kids and political correctness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
"Does it not constitute a danger to the Nazi movement if it can be said that Nazi leaders are chosen for sexual reasons?"

Astoundingly, this has a familiar sound.

31 posted on 10/15/2010 12:28:58 PM PDT by donna (The fruits of Feminism: Angry fathers, bitter mothers, fat kids and political correctness.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

And all of those assaults happened during a time when service men and women have to keep their same sex attraction secret.


32 posted on 10/15/2010 1:14:10 PM PDT by Truth is a Weapon (If I weren't afraid of the feds, I would refer to Obama as our "undocumented POTUS")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Spok

The more things changes the more theys stay the same.—Pogo
If I remembers correct. This report sounds like the 93 Pentagon report and reflects what I experienced between Jun69-Jan.77.But I hear they don’t “lust after their military peers”
And I believe that about as much as I believe Barack Hussein Obama is a natural born citizen.


33 posted on 10/15/2010 1:16:44 PM PDT by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

Oh my goodness, I just read that PDF, and I am sickened and outraged.

On top of the assaults, some of these attackers were honorably discharged. Honorably. Good Lord help us.

Very soon reporting crimes such as these will be deemed homophobia and hate crimes. We will soon complete our descent into Sodom and Gomorrah.

Jesus, come quickly!


34 posted on 10/15/2010 1:18:50 PM PDT by Shelayne (He who testifies to these things says, "Yes, I am coming quickly" Amen. Come, Lord Jesus! *Rev 22:20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fml

The man who wishes he was qualified to be President B.O. never
spent even one week in military basic training, admits he is no “expert” but desires to push his unfounded /unsound beliefs on everybody in the military -and in the US of A His only
justification is the LIE from the father of Lies “We’re all Gods children” Read Romans chapter 9: or I John and tell me if/how you can reconcile Barack Hussein Obamas belief to Scripture?The Tares do look like good seed—till they produce their evil fruit.


35 posted on 10/15/2010 1:23:32 PM PDT by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

Keep the homos OUT!


36 posted on 10/15/2010 1:24:04 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Just vote them OUT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

Our Founders used the Dutch model and John Calvin with his
Christian discipline one of the European models-see Guardians of the Republic ,Ernest F.fisher,Jr. Stackpole books p.4
Justin Lipsius another model(1994)


37 posted on 10/15/2010 1:29:41 PM PDT by StonyBurk (ring)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan

Speaking as a member of the military, it’s well known that a lot of man-on-man “sexual assaults” in the military are consensual sex. They got caught, or somehow people found out, and one of them will cry rape to avoid UCMJ and/or chapter.

That doesn’t change the whole rest of the argument on the issue, but numbers of homosexual assaults in the military are vastly overinflated because of DADT.


38 posted on 10/15/2010 3:05:20 PM PDT by Domalais
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nmh

They`ll also be forced to hold many more court-martials since I can`t imagine too many real men standing for this crap without kicking some faggot`s head in for trying to rape him. I know I`d beat one to within an inch of it`s death for trying that $#it on me.


39 posted on 10/16/2010 12:33:45 PM PDT by nomad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
Notice all of the listed sexual assaults of fellow military involved the gay assaulter being of higher rank than the assaulted. This is a big deal in the military, as somebody of higher rank has MUCH more power than a comparable situation in a regular work environment.

In a combat environment, do not be surprised if gay officers and NCOs who sexually harass others get fragged.

40 posted on 10/16/2010 12:46:38 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("It is only when we've lost everything, that we are free to do anything" -- Fight Club)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: donna; scripter; little jeremiah; Antoninus
The Community of the Special (CS) asserted that male homosexuality was the foundation of all nation-states and that male homosexuals represented an elite .....Brand said in Der Eigene that he wanted men who “thirst for a revival of Greek times and Hellenic standards of beauty after centuries of Christian barbarism.”

If they feel that strongly about it, they should gather together their elite shekels of silver and go buy Paraguay or something.

Poaching on the very different American ideal of the Framers should be requited with the scorn and rejection it deserves -- whether Communist poaching, homosexualist poaching, or Islamist poaching.

41 posted on 10/16/2010 1:12:52 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan; 185JHP; AFA-Michigan; Abathar; Agitate; Albion Wilde; AliVeritas; ...
Homosexual Agenda Ping

Freepmail wagglebee to subscribe or unsubscribe from the homosexual agenda ping list.

Be sure to click the FreeRepublic homosexual agenda keyword search link for a list of all related articles. We don't ping you to all related articles so be sure to click the previous link to see the latest articles.

Add keywords homosexual agenda to flag FR articles to this ping list.

Excellent article and information. Anyone pushing the homosexual agenda, especially wanting homosexuals in the military - and there are number of them on FR - need to have their heads grabbed and their faces rubbed in these facts.

42 posted on 10/16/2010 1:28:39 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

FYI - you might want to see this, more ammunition against “gays” in the military.


43 posted on 10/16/2010 1:33:48 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

Saw it yesterday, thanks.


44 posted on 10/16/2010 1:36:18 PM PDT by Jim Robinson (Rebellion is brewing!! Just vote them OUT!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan; af_vet_rr; stevie_d_64; Bigun; rustbucket
Thanx for the post of gay Nazi history I hadn't seen a lot of before ......

Funny how society never got the word on all the Nazi horridity.

Reminder to self that the Nazis were a party of the Left .....

...William Shirer describes Roehm as "a stocky, bull-necked, piggish-eyed, scar- faced professional soldier...[and] like so many of the early Nazis, a homosexual" (Shirer:64)

We need more like him in the U.S. Army?

45 posted on 10/16/2010 1:48:27 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
YW...it runs counter to the left wing propaganda that has influenced popular misconceptions. See this thread, Hitler was a Leftist
46 posted on 10/16/2010 1:58:52 PM PDT by Conservative Coulter Fan (I am defiantly proud of being part of the Religious Right in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Conservative Coulter Fan
"Roehm.....had surrounded himself with a staff of perverts. His chiefs, men of rank of Gruppenfuhrer or Obergruppenfuhrer, commanding units of several hundred thousand Storm Troopers, were almost without exception homosexuals. Indeed, unless a Storm Troop officer were homosexual he had no chance of advancement"

Good quote. And explanatory of the smug reflection of a New York Times editor, on the fact that something like 3/4's of the Page One editors of The New York Times are homosexual or bisexual.

As with the SA Brown Shirts, so now, 75 years later, with "Pinchy" Sulzberger and his New York Times.

47 posted on 10/16/2010 1:59:03 PM PDT by lentulusgracchus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kozak

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JlsdwxdGa9c

Totally destroys the whole idea behind the battle, but its still kinda funny...


48 posted on 10/16/2010 2:07:54 PM PDT by stevie_d_64 (I'm jus' sayin')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Jim Robinson

I should have known you’d already seen it!


49 posted on 10/16/2010 2:21:48 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus; Conservative Coulter Fan; af_vet_rr; stevie_d_64; Bigun; rustbucket

http://www.defendthefamily.com/pfrc/books/pinkswastika/html/the_pinkswastika_4th_edition_-_final.htm

The Pink Swastika online.

Excellent reference book for Nazi history and homosexuality. I have the first and a subsequent edition. And it’s all online. Everyone should read this book.


50 posted on 10/16/2010 2:23:47 PM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point.CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson