To: ColdOne
Did you read the article? That sure wasn’t much of a defense. Condi was being diplomatic. That is afterall, what she was, a diplomat.
17 posted on
10/16/2010 2:56:01 PM PDT by
Eva
To: Eva
Wow! 17 comments before the suggestion to read the article! Just amazing. It’s so much easier to comment on the headline. Reading the article could take time.
26 posted on
10/16/2010 2:59:33 PM PDT by
EDINVA
To: Eva
I read the article. It wasn't a ringing endorsement of Obama foreign policy but it sure wasn't much of a criticism, either. If 'diplomatic' is interpreted as saying nothing of any real substance, Condi accomplished that quite nicely. However, she was at the White House as a guest of the president. Not the time or place to announce anything really critical of your host. Still, I doubt Condi Rice is ever going to be a huge critic of Obama because, after all, he's 'historic'.
30 posted on
10/16/2010 3:06:17 PM PDT by
Jim Scott
(Cautious optimist)
To: Eva
I agree. she is still part of the Washington system albeit from Palo Alto. But she is still one of THEM.
40 posted on
10/16/2010 3:11:53 PM PDT by
Marty62
(marty60)
To: Eva
Condi was being diplomatic. That is afterall, what she was, a diplomat.
What you are saying is it's a diplomat's job to lie. Gotcha!
To: Eva
Yes I did.. she did say this.....Rice said, "Nothing in this president's methods suggests this president is other than a defender of America's interests. We all know that is wrong.
44 posted on
10/16/2010 3:16:27 PM PDT by
ColdOne
(GOP. Gutless Old Politicians :^)).....Tolerance for thee but none for me)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson