To: Blood of Tyrants
Why was a constitutional amendment needed to outlaw liquor on a national basis, yet cannibis can be outlawed nationwide with simply a statute?
I have asked that question repeatedly in the past and one of the few answers I got was that they didnt really need to pass a constitutional amendment, they just did to make sure the people really wanted it (or some such nonsense).
Actually, the given reason is that an amendment is much harder to repeal and they wanted it to stick.
When I pointed out that the original federal drug laws were declared unconstitutional by the SC in the 1930s...
Cite?
To: publiusF27
Just look up the history of drug laws in the US.
58 posted on
10/17/2010 7:14:33 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Islam is the religion of Satan and Mohammed was his minion.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson