Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

401(k) plans will have to disclose fees (by 2012)
Washington Post ^ | 10/16/10 | Margaret Collins

Posted on 10/17/2010 8:43:05 PM PDT by Libloather

401(k) plans will have to disclose fees
By Margaret Collins
Saturday, October 16, 2010; 8:55 PM

Employer-sponsored 401(k) retirement plans will have to disclose fees that savers pay on investments and transactions by 2012, the Labor Department said.

"Participants will be able to understand the dramatic effect fees play in the returns that they get," Assistant Secretary of Labor Phyllis Borzi said.

The regulations, which will apply to the plans by Jan. 1, 2012, will require companies to provide investors information on administrative and investment fees charged to their accounts in their quarterly statements, the department said.

Regulators and legislators have been studying fees for 401(k) plans as more workers use them to save for retirement. An estimated 72 million participants have 401(k)-type retirement plans with assets totaling about $3 trillion, the department said.

"Participants really haven't been confronted with the fees they pay," said David Wray, president of the Profit Sharing/401k Council of America, a Chicago-based nonprofit association of employers that sponsor retirement plans. While investors have been able to get many details on fees upon request or by searching through paperwork, "the difference here is some of that information is going to be given to you whether you ask for it or not," he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 401k; fees; pensions; retirement
"Participants will be able to understand the dramatic effect fees play in the returns that they get," Assistant Secretary of Labor Phyllis Borzi said.

They should do the same with Sosha Security.

1 posted on 10/17/2010 8:43:08 PM PDT by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

before or after the government siezes them?


2 posted on 10/17/2010 8:52:38 PM PDT by GeronL (http://libertyfic.proboards.com <--- My Fiction/ Science Fiction Board)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: berdie

later


3 posted on 10/17/2010 8:56:40 PM PDT by berdie (Hey, Bill Mahr...That's Mrs. Cracker to you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Many years ago I was on my former company's 401k committee when we were selecting a new investment company. I was difficult to get the broker to let us have a simple, low cost S&P 500 index. They only wanted to offer expensive bond and specialized stock funds.

My current company (much smaller than the previous one) just picked Schwab and lets the employees invest in anything at the retail prices which are far cheaper than the old company's plan.

4 posted on 10/17/2010 9:23:55 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Grblb blabt unt mipt speeb!! Oot piffoo blaboo...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Can I see how Government workers’ pensions are funded? Oh, yes, through tax dollars for life.


5 posted on 10/17/2010 9:25:35 PM PDT by wac3rd (Somewhere in Hell, Ted Kennedy snickers....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

What?? You mean they are not free?

DEMOCRATS PROMISED ME A 401K THAT’S FEE FREEEEEEEE!!!!

That’s because they are going to quit letting folks sock away pre-tax money into their 401Ks.

That’s right! The Democrats will only let you sock away your own money with after-tax cash. Then they will tax you again on the backend!!

This is after they already take 50% of your money for income and payroll taxes!!!


6 posted on 10/17/2010 9:53:56 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Obama and Biden. The gift that just keeps on giving.... er.. taking.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Looks like a good bill.


7 posted on 10/17/2010 11:47:21 PM PDT by Undocumented_capitalist (Pure is the enemy of good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
Isn't this hyper-ironic? The government is now concerned with what we are getting for what we pay? I thought the 401k fees were already posted?

How about what we get for what we pay in income tax?

If the government goes on to steal my IRA under some ruse, it will be the material theft of a lifetime of work. All bets are off as to what would happen thereafter. I would really hope this would not happen.

8 posted on 10/18/2010 7:40:15 PM PDT by The_Media_never_lie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson