Posted on 10/18/2010 3:37:26 AM PDT by Son House
"That would be stimulative, because people who need money in their pocket to spend and pay for the things that they need to live would have more money in their pocket," Axelrod said in an interview.
Hey a$$h*le. We already HAVE that money, it's OURS.
We worked for it ya jackass.
he continued to argue that extending the cuts for everybody, including the upper-income brackets, would not be worth the cost and would not stimulate the economyFAIL. Thanks Son House.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.