Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv; Clintonfatigued; ml/nj; ExTexasRedhead; MaggieCarta; theothercheek; Red Steel; ...
IIRC, this is very similar to the post-election MSM mantra in 1994. Then it was "angry white men" who turned out - while the overall turnout was reported as "low" - to enable the GOP to wrest control of Congress.

I don't think there was any "early voting" back then, though, except via absentee ballots. "Early voting" should be abandoned because it increases the potential degree of fraud.

66 posted on 10/19/2010 2:36:54 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: justiceseeker93

“Then it was “angry white men” who turned out - while the overall turnout was reported as “low” - to enable the GOP to wrest control of Congress.”

I detest the lame stream media!


71 posted on 10/19/2010 4:15:06 PM PDT by SeattleBruce (T minus 14 days to SMACKDOWN - Tea Party like it's 1773! Pray 2 Chronicles 7:14!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: justiceseeker93

6 AM on election day is early enough for me.


72 posted on 10/19/2010 4:21:17 PM PDT by Impy (Don't call me red.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

To: justiceseeker93

I think that elections should be held on Election Day, not before. Everyone should vote while being privy to all the information that comes to light by Election Day.


76 posted on 10/19/2010 5:17:34 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson