BWAHAHAHA! I'll give you credit for coming right out and expressing full-throated contempt for the Constitution.
JSM I am quite comfortable with settled law and keeping these illegal.
I have no doubt about that. Wickardistas generally support case law under the Wickard Commerce Clause. You and other Drug War Whores should read Justice Thomas and learn:
Respondents Diane Monson and Angel Raich use marijuana that has never been bought or sold, that has never crossed state lines, and that has had no demonstrable effect on the national market for marijuana. If Congress can regulate this under the Commerce Clause, then it can regulate virtually anything, and the Federal Government is no longer one of limited and enumerated powers.
J. Thomas, in Raich
Big government legalization pimps aren't about the Constitution- they are in the employ of large dollar criminal interests. As such, in our narcissistic society they have no idea about anything other than their own greatly exaggerated selves. In the case of legalization it is where AFSCME, SEIU, La Raza and others meet up with the lazy stoned entitlement class and their suppliers, in the name of “increased tax revenues”! What a joke.
Anyone who uses the royal “us” then pontificates and pronounces judgments by filling in where nothing has been said, has problems that can't be solved on FR. The Bandar-log talk constantly of their abilities, and their plans, in self-righteous anointed tones of the chattering classes. Stonies chatter a lot, and remarkably lack focus, imagine that! Wickardistas? People can still do what they want, and they always have. A lot of hate for someone who reveres the Constitution. Want to officially change things, then change the labeling. While we're getting all instructional, you might find that interesting instead of driving a truck through the law. Again, it is a Sched I. “Be-De,Be-De,Be-De....that's all folks!”