American Pravda
Is better than old Soviet version, no?
She is corrrect. “Seperation of Church and State” is a product of judicial fiat.
Might be a good story but this is a blog so it belongs in bloggers.
It sorta shows what shining many lights on a particular something can do. They changed it because the 1st version was so particularly wrong. And many of the original accounts were wrong, showing the ignorance of the author.
The irony is that, in fact, the event and the article show the ignorance of the media, a supposedly educated law school audience, and Coons regarding the constitution.
Her critics can get away with making fun of her on this because the average TV watcher doesn’t realize she’s right. There no such phrase in the constitution and the intent is to protect religion from government, not to protect government from religion.
WDEL (debate holders) had an article: “Widener professor: Coons was clear winner” (10/19/10) by Amy Smart.
Didn’t mention the professor is a Dem donor, $250 to Obama.
I emailed the info to them- no change, no response.
O’Donnell has a very hostile media with no compunctions or ethics.
The left was all over this....
What kind of law school is Widener - that they did not understand her simple point?
Just liberal idiot law school?
They come out of this looking ridiculous.
Coons - and media - expected to be ridiculous. The “gasp from the crowd” - was very striking. Andtheir comments to follow - just make them seem small, and weak minded.
Ah, but the damage was already done. I’ll also note that the early CNN report left out an important sentence when “documenting” the back and forth between the candidates.
We are at war with Eastasia. We have always been at war with Eastasia.
The fraud is never-ending. God, we MUST persevere again and again and again and again until we drain this swampland.