Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: iowamark
Last I looked, the Constitution only restrained the FedGov, and no-one else.

What part of the Constitution gives the federal gooberment the power to regulate intra-state rentals? Seems like a state's issue, if any government should be involved. And it shouldn't. Not even if she advertised for a brand new block of 100 apartments (No Irish Need Apply). Not the business of the state.

/johnny

15 posted on 10/21/2010 6:46:23 PM PDT by JRandomFreeper (Gone Galt)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: JRandomFreeper
Umm...incorporation for thee but not for them, so you say.

The original intent of the 1st Amend. was blown apart by the 14th Amend. and the “incorporation doctrine”. The thing is when people fight for the free exercise of religion publicly (Especially Christianity) in which the States violate the “incorporation doctrine” (Cantwell v. Connecticut, 310 U.S. 296,), the ACLU, anti-Christians etc..., revert to the original intent, hmmm... Which is it? The current state of the 1st Amendment is a paradoxical mess (Designed of course by Statist).

83 posted on 10/22/2010 5:57:46 AM PDT by rollo tomasi (Working hard to pay for deadbeats and corrupt politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson