To: justlurking
Without consulting the passengers in his minivan "there was no time to take a vote" Innes kicked into engineer mode. I'm glad everything worked out, but I might question whether he had the right to risk other people's lives to make a hero of himself.
2 posted on
10/22/2010 9:15:43 AM PDT by
Mr Ramsbotham
(Laws against sodomy are honored in the breech.)
To: Mr Ramsbotham
They were his kids, they don’t always get a vote.
6 posted on
10/22/2010 9:23:25 AM PDT by
fml
To: Mr Ramsbotham
Maybe but this kind of changes things: He knew a busy intersection was just ahead,
9 posted on
10/22/2010 9:28:30 AM PDT by
DJ MacWoW
(If Bam is the answer, the question was stupid.)
To: Mr Ramsbotham
"I'm glad everything worked out, but I might question whether he had the right to risk other people's lives to make a hero of himself." Given the known physics of what he was doing there really wasn't a risk.
10 posted on
10/22/2010 9:30:05 AM PDT by
avacado
To: Mr Ramsbotham
I'm glad everything worked out, but I might question whether he had the right to risk other people's lives to make a hero of himself. Basic physics. If the other vehicle was doing 40 mph and he was doing 35, the relative velocity is 5 mph. The relative velocity doesn't provide enough energy or momentum to kill; it's not even going to scratch his kids. After that, he's braking for both of them, and again it isn't going to kill anyone, since there is no further significant impact. He thought fast, he thought accurately, and he saved the lives of strangers without risking his own kids, just involving them with an up close view of doing the right thing. Personally, I think that's the best thing a parent can do for his kids.
11 posted on
10/22/2010 9:32:24 AM PDT by
Pollster1
(Natural born citizen of the USA, with the birth certificate to prove it)
To: Mr Ramsbotham
Valid point, but unrealistic under those circumstances. I doubt many who risk their lives like this consider a cost benefit analysis before reacting. Probably a good thing, too.
I doubt if he even considered anything other than trying to end the situation with minimal damage and loss of life. I also would be willing to bet a cup of overpriced Seattle coffee the thought of being a “hero” never once crossed the gentleman’s mind. The way I see it, the situation and how a human reacts is what determines a hero, not the other way around.
I’m certainly glad this came to a good end.
To: Mr Ramsbotham
Sounds like his quick thinking was the right decision to avoid certain tragedy given the intersection coming up. Not sure why you accused him of trying to be a hero.
Most people would have simply rubbernecked while being paralyzed at the same time, thinking about a liability backlash.
15 posted on
10/22/2010 9:34:05 AM PDT by
motoman
To: Mr Ramsbotham
Some do, and others think about it. gotta love professionals in whatever craft they deal in.
16 posted on
10/22/2010 9:35:29 AM PDT by
VaRepublican
(I would propagate taglines but I don't know how. But bloggers do.)
To: Mr Ramsbotham
I’m glad everything worked out, but I might question whether he had the right to risk other people’s lives to make a hero of himself.
*********************************
“there was no time to take a vote”
To: Mr Ramsbotham
Oh for the love of Christ!
Get a life, FRiend!
18 posted on
10/22/2010 9:37:18 AM PDT by
clee1
(We use 43 muscles to frown, 17 to smile, and 2 to pull a trigger. I'm lazy and I'm tired of smiling.)
To: Mr Ramsbotham
make a hero of himself Are you only motivated by the opportunity for notoriety?
25 posted on
10/22/2010 9:44:34 AM PDT by
Ben Mugged
(War does not determine who is right -- only who is left.)
To: Mr Ramsbotham
"...I might question whether he had the right to risk other people's lives to make a hero of himself." It doesn't sound like he did it "to make a hero of himself." I suspect his motivations were otherwise.
27 posted on
10/22/2010 9:46:28 AM PDT by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Mr Ramsbotham
Really? Would it have been o’k to risk his own life even if it meant his kids could end up fatherless? Every risk can end up in loss that is why it is called risk. The bigger risk was Daddy doing nothing and letting the kids know its all about them even if it resulted in the death of others.
To: Mr Ramsbotham
Really? Would it have been o’k to risk his own life even if it meant his kids could end up fatherless? Every risk can end up in loss that is why it is called risk. The bigger risk was Daddy doing nothing and letting the kids know its all about them even if it resulted in the death of others.
To: Mr Ramsbotham
I'm glad everything worked out, but I might question whether he had the right to risk other people's lives to make a hero of himself.
A crash at a busy intersection would have been a disaster and could have resulted in the injury/deaths of even more people. He made the right choice.
33 posted on
10/22/2010 9:58:15 AM PDT by
reagan_fanatic
(Today, Congress. Tomorrow, the White House!)
To: Mr Ramsbotham
kicked into engineer mode. The self-infatuation of engineers is unfailing. They almost make lawyers look like normal people in comparison.
52 posted on
10/22/2010 1:09:46 PM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This post is not a statement of fact. It is merely a personal opinion -- or humor -- or both.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson