The present occupant is administrator of one branch of government, and he convinced a large part of the populace to hire him.
He is not, AM never has been a leader of anything and if you are even remotely honest - you will have to admit that he makes no major decisions (those are probably made by Soros) and can not even speak for himself. He merely postures while reading out whatever someone else types into his teleprompter.
Now, in ansel12's book that may be leading, but quite a lot of us see it as being a pathetic puppet.
Do you wish to try to defend your point and show that all of these policies and moves are of O'bonghit's devising?
Perhaps you wish to explain why YOU PERSONALLY have chosen to defend allowing the third world to dump it's criminal element here? And why do you personally oppose groups like The Family Research Council or The Second Amendment Sisters being able to advocate their positions in the media during the final weeks of an election?
Those is your positions after all, since those are the positions I insist Palin abandon with her actions as well as her words.
Make no mistake - these questions are not going to go away. I will avert nothing and I will be right here on these forums, and debating people in person to advance my positions and make others defend theirs.
So far, you personally have been unable to say just why the positions Palin supports by supporting McCain are okay, and you are using every rhetorical dodge you can come up with to try to avoid answering.
That post made no sense, I thought the previous one was drifting, but this one is way out there.