Replies

Woods's M.O. is to act like a wild man, throwing abuse at anyone who disagrees with him, until some readers assume he just has to be right. So now his critics and opponents are "zombies." Tomorrow he'll call them something else, and some people will be taken in by that as well.

Good discussion here.

The discussion that you linked to was quite interesting.

But it seems that of the only three who didn't like Woods book (excluding the guy who complained that he couldn't get the audio version to play without an MP3 player), two argued that Woods didn't go FAR enough in upsetting the apple cart, and the other argued for the judiciary being the sole arbiter of what's Constitutional. "Didn't go far enough" with specific objections is NOT "Zombie behavior", it's disagreement. "Let the Federal courts decide" IS Zombie behavior. I would suspect that Woods got far more of the latter than the former -- along with the "lunatic fringe" label, and that's who he was referring to as "Zombies"

Yes, that opinion of "Nullification" is certainly popular at 6% of the reviews.

Woods's M.O. is to act like a wild man, throwing abuse at anyone who disagrees with him, until some readers assume he just has to be right.

He's just fighting fire with fire.