To: Carry_Okie
The humor may strike you well enough, but I was wondering what you may know has been tried using the nullification to defeat the Feds signing any old treaty that steals States’ or individual Rights?
20 posted on
10/23/2010 7:29:55 PM PDT by
Avoiding_Sulla
(Yesterday's Left = today's status quo. Thus CONSERVATIVE is a conflicted label for battling tyranny.)
To: Carry_Okie
21 posted on
10/23/2010 7:31:37 PM PDT by
Avoiding_Sulla
(Yesterday's Left = today's status quo. Thus CONSERVATIVE is a conflicted label for battling tyranny.)
To: Avoiding_Sulla
I was wondering what you may know has been tried using the nullification to defeat the Feds signing any old treaty that steals States’ or individual Rights? It's never been done.
22 posted on
10/23/2010 9:12:15 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
To: Avoiding_Sulla
First of all,
You are an extremist, by the way, if the enforcer can't find a place for you on the spectrum that runs from Mitch McConnell to Hillary Clinton.
LMAO.
As to the rest, the list of unconstitutional laws and treaties is so long, they'd better get started so that they can complete a bill within a legislative session.
23 posted on
10/23/2010 9:17:35 PM PDT by
Carry_Okie
(The environment is too complex and too important to manage by central planning.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson