Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: UCANSEE2

You mean a universe without photons? Well, since we’re making this up as we go here, I think that a photonless universe would still have mass. The question is does a baryonic universe require photons, and I think it might be OK, but Genesis suggests otherwise (no light, no anything).

Certainly you could not observe much in a universe without photons.


23 posted on 10/26/2010 8:19:09 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: DBrow
Certainly you could not observe much in a universe without photons.

Might be a little nippy to.

28 posted on 10/26/2010 8:32:20 AM PDT by The Cajun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow

I cot completely lost when someone was explaining string theory and it dawned on me that we were just energy anyway. Suddenly anything and nothing seemed equally likely. Being rather math challenged is really a very BIG disability!


34 posted on 10/26/2010 8:50:15 AM PDT by brytlea (Jesus loves me, this I know.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

To: DBrow
You mean a universe without photons? Well, since we’re making this up as we go here, I think that a photonless universe would still have mass. The question is does a baryonic universe require photons, and I think it might be OK, but Genesis suggests otherwise (no light, no anything).
Certainly you could not observe much in a universe without photons.

In the beginning there was nothing.
And God said, "Let there be light."
And there still was nothing, but now you could see it.
46 posted on 10/26/2010 11:21:39 AM PDT by Colinsky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson