Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: fabrizio

Even though he’s right on this he’s still just a Pope and not a grantor of (nor dictator of) rights.


4 posted on 10/26/2010 8:41:02 AM PDT by lewislynn ( It's not going to be who wins a seat, rather it will be who loses a seat that will save America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: lewislynn
You mean, just THE Pope.
5 posted on 10/26/2010 8:42:46 AM PDT by Celtic Cross (I AM the Impeccable Hat.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn

This is for those FReepers who claim that B16 is pro-illegal immigrations.


6 posted on 10/26/2010 8:46:55 AM PDT by netmilsmom (Happiness is a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn

which he has never claimed to be. The whole point of the Catholic doctrine of the temporal order is that there are certain rights, duties and principles that transcend our volatile convictions and majorities. If you can put your anti-catholicism aside for a moment, when your favorite politicians or thinker says that citizens have certain rights, is such politician or thinker speaking as a grantor or “dictator” of said rights or is he just reminding a fact to his listeners/readers?


10 posted on 10/26/2010 8:49:35 AM PDT by fabrizio (Restore the Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

To: lewislynn

It’s certainly true that the pope is not a grantor or dictator of rights. He would not claim to be.


26 posted on 10/26/2010 10:20:40 AM PDT by Mrs. Don-o (Servum servorum Dei.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson