[Tucson_AZ]

Just in time... /s

Meanwhile, 3,000 voter registrations and early ballot requests (submitted on the deadline day) by a Democrat organization in Southern Arizona have been found to be at least 60% (and counting) fraudulent.

[DoughtyOne]

I'm not sure how many people realize that this decision WAS NOT handed down by the Ninth Circuit Court.

Ninth Circuit Court members split on this decision.  A non-seated judge made the final decision on this matter.  And it's questionable in my mind whether the third judge had legal standing.  Nobody appointed her to the Ninth Circuit Court.  Can you just volunteer to serve on the Ninth Circuit Court?  Evidently so...

Take a look at who presided on this issue.  Anyone recognize that first person.

(Matter appeared) Before:

Sandra Day O’Connor, Associate Justice,*
Alex Kozinski, Chief Judge
Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judge

Opinion by Judge Ikuta

Dissent by Chief Judge Kozinski

Note Page Six of this PDF presentation of the "Court's" decision.  There you'll be able to verifty who represented the Ninth Circuit Court on this matter.

http://www.ca9.uscourts.gov/datastore/opinions/2010/10/26/08-17094.pdf

* Yep, that's SCOTUS Retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.

For the last three to six months, the Ninth Circuit Court has been handing down some interesting, more Conservative decisions.  Now this.

Could this decision be challenged?  Nobody appointed O'Connor to the Ninth Circuit Court.  What legal standing does she have to sit in on these cases?