Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: library user
...demanded video of the interview be turned over to the campaign and destroyed because such videotaping had not been previously approved...

Sounds like she had grounds. Not an issue.

3 posted on 10/27/2010 1:01:33 PM PDT by Islander7 (If you want to anger conservatives, lie to them. If you want to anger liberals, tell them the truth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Islander7

Sounds like she had grounds. Not an issue.

<><><><>

Guess you didn’t read the full article. She had no grounds and her campaign apologized to the radio station once the lawyers all got involved.


5 posted on 10/27/2010 1:03:44 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Islander7

Not an issue whatsoever — yet another stupid move by her ham-handed, amateurish staff. If this woman ends up losing (God forbid) she need look no further than her inner office to figure out why.


8 posted on 10/27/2010 1:05:43 PM PDT by hampdenkid
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: Islander7
Sounds like she had grounds. Not an issue.

Then why did she apologize?

From the article:

Upon further investigation, WDEL says O'Donnell's attorney called the station to apologize for the uproar and threat of litigation.

Sounds as if she had no grounds at all.

9 posted on 10/27/2010 1:05:46 PM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson