The whole debate seems to have an unimportant factor as far as I'm concerned. If the bag o skin next to me can shoot straight and has a good head on their shoulders, I really don't care much about the rest.
Would you be open to a military REFERENDUM?, which is -— to allow ALL SOLDIERS in the Coast Guard, Airforce, Army, Navy and Marines to vote on this issue?
After all, they’re the ones fighting and they’re the ones who should know whether their morale or fighting ability will be affected or not.
Liberalism is a mental disorder, FRiend.
You need a check up from the neck up.
First the Pink Hand destroyed the Democrat party. Then the Pink Hand destroyed the Catholic church. It has taken over Hollywood and television. It has destroyed everything it touches. Now the Pink Hand will destroy the US military. No big deal? You're an idiot for saying that.
The queer agenda marches on. I've had enough!
“If the bag o skin next to me can shoot straight and has a good head on their shoulders, I really don’t care much about the rest.”
I changed my mind, and decided to NOT respond to that self written joke.
The whole debate seems to have an unimportant factor as far as I’m concerned. If the ‘bag o skin next to me’ can ‘shoot straight’ and has a ‘good head’ on their shoulders, I really don’t care much about the rest.
We hear ya’.
My husband says if he was in a battle, he would want God on his side. How could that be if he is opposed to the troops? Please, vote No to Homosexuals openly serving. (How we wish that was on the ballot.)
The problem with your premise is that you are under the naive illusion that openly gay military personnel are first and foremost committed soldiers.
I wouldn't want to have to put my trust into someone who's priority is for the world to know their sexual preference. There's an agenda here, and it ain't the defense of the nation.
You are, I am sorry to say, either incredibly ignorant about the “gay” agenda, or a libertarian. Or something.
AIDS - faggots - blood - military - wounds - soldiers bleeding on other people - emergency transfusions...
That alone is enough to ban them from the military. What to speak of the elevated numbers already of homosexual rape.
Homosexuality is a mental illness, a perversion and a grave character defect. Plus they are wildly promiscuous and their filthy sex practices spread incredible kinds of diseases and parasites.
They do NOT belong in the military whatsoever.
the article is B/S and as a vet who still has serving friends then they think it;s B/S too.
Shall we let men in who like to have sex with animals too because they can shoot a gun.
utter crap,
I say this for the majority of guys I have served with around the world.
We don’;t want homosexual serving at all
_____________________________________
Paul Lynde ain't dead...he writes on Free Republic.
If the bag o skin next to me can shoot straight and has a good head on their shoulders, I really don’t care much about the rest.
That’s in the combat situation (a low percentage of most military service careers}. How ‘bout in the office, lunch room, hangar, etc. when you hear two of “them” talking about how they’d like to bed the same sex Sarge, CPO, etc. or when one of them makes suggestive comments to you. If that doesn’t repulse you, then you have been truly “diversified”.