Okay, I’ll ask you too:
Homosexuals - AIDS - emergency transfusions - high incidence of homosexual rape - soldiers bleeding on people.
What part of this is not clear to you?
Probably the most compelling argument against that I've heard. One I won't discount as mere hysteria and emotionalism. At least... compelling considering enlistment of gay men in particular. It's not a threat that relates to women.
So... I'll grant you that. It's not easy to dismiss that very real practicality.
Discussing an issue and asking for reason, not hysterics, is not "pushing an agenda" it's what will be required in this era. That's the way it is outside this little echo chamber. Doesn't matter to me if you get it.
{What part of this is not clear to you?}
You misunderstood my post, I’m NOT in favor of openly homosexuals serving. I served in the Navy and am well aware of the disruption it can cause in the ranks.
I probably should have added sarc. somewhere in my post.
{What part of this is not clear to you?}
You misunderstood my post, I’m NOT in favor of openly homosexuals serving. I served in the Navy and am well aware of the disruption it can cause in the ranks.
I probably should have added sarc. somewhere in my post.