Palin and Greta respond to latest Politico hit piece: "Not worth wrapping my pink salmon in"

http://www.conservatives4palin.com/2010/10/donate-to-sarahpac-governor-palin-fires.html ^ | C4P

[PSYCHO-FREEP]

LOL! You would have to be Alaskan to understand just what this means, like being able to “see Russia from here” (A true statement, ref; Big and little Diomede Islands.)

To an Alaskan, Pink Salmon is the trashiest fish that one would waste their time catching. The canneries during the turn of the century had to can them. They are not worth any thing else.

This is the ultimate slam and quite clever at that.

[Joann37]

A very good quality video is up right now, in the middle of the page, at gretawire.com. Greta is outraged at the anonymous sources and lack of journalistic integrity!

FYI, I believe Greta’s homepage is updated frequently, so if you check back later, it may be moved.

[tommix2]

A very good quality video is up right nowThank you , I'll go to it right now.I posted the comment in the hope the producers would improve in the future.

[AFreeBird]

During her interview wih Chris Wallace, she was asked if she w going to run. She responded by saying ‘why would I give up all the freedom and fun I’m having now, I don’t need a title’. Then in answer to the next question, which I don’t recall off hand, she said’. You know, America is worth the sacrifice.’

I don’t know what she’s going to do, she may even know just yet. But if she decides to go for it: Sarah Palin has my vote.

[McGruff]

A couple of fired up women there.

Am I the only one that thinks fish wrap is another word for toilet paper.

[Abundy]

I wouldn’t either, just pointing out that there is a purely reasonable explanation (I know, the explanation isn’t reasonable by western standards, but it is what it is) that doesn’t involve terrorism.

[Magic Fingers]

“I wouldn’t either, just pointing out that there is a purely reasonable explanation (I know, the explanation isn’t reasonable by western standards, but it is what it is) that doesn’t involve terrorism.”

Of course there is a non-terrorism explanation for the behavior. The problem is that you can only find out whether or not it was “reasonable” after the fact, and if you guess wrong you’re dead.