Posted on 11/03/2010 2:35:07 AM PDT by restornu
3 Americans shot to death near Mexico-U.S. border
News Canada Canadian man found dead in Mexico By Doug Hempstead, QMI Agency
Family mourns Carleton Place man killed in Mexico, but says he feared for his safety
Family suspects Canadian's death in Mexico linked to high-level contacts
A Mexico massacre in unfamiliar place: the capital
4 plant workers slain on buses in Mexico
(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...
This is a ping list promoting Immigration Enforcement and Congressional Reform.
If you wish to be added or removed from this ping list, please contact me.
'Sushi-chef rapist' of South Beach sentenced to 40 years
Federal Appellate Judge Skeptical of Federal Suit Against Arizona's Immigration Enforcement Law
Court signals backing for Arizona immigration law
Obama Continues to Play Hispanics on Immigration Issue
Justice, Denied (Holder/Obama Justice Dept.)
Four Americans Killed in Separate Attacks in Border City, Mexican Authorities Say
Adopt Mexico’s immigration policy and build the friggin’ fence.
Ping!
Ping!
Wonder if those were 3 innocent Americans...or...Americans who have gotten involved in the drug trade.
Wow so quick to buy into the propaganda just like the man on his water ski was also report into drug trade and his wife was to have done him in etc.
That aside the minds of the average American seems to be able to easy minipulated to side with those who does not have our best interest at heart!
This same mind set allows this kind of thinking!
Excerpt from Rush talk
Who the Hell are These People to Decide the Limits of Our Freedom?
Looked at within the prism of liberty and freedom, as our founding documents spell out, the Declaration, the Constitution, in nowhere in any of our founding documents was it ever said that people earning X would be punished for it. It was never said in our founding documents that people earning X would share a greater burden of funding the government than people who didn’t. Where does all this talk start? Because all this is nothing more than a direct attack on liberty, a direct attack on freedom and it creates class envy and resentment and anger between the classes, between people of different income groups. So all of a sudden we’re faced with a possibility here of the Bush tax cuts ending for people who earn $250,000 a year or more. Well, why are we even discussing it in the first place? What did those people do? What is the magic? Who sets arbitrarily this figure of $250,000 a year? Why are they targeted? And look how easily people fall into the trap of debating the premise, when the real question is when is the federal government going to assume responsibility for the deficit spending, for the irresponsible position they put this country in? When are they going to be forced to reduce the behavior, to limit the behavior they are engaging in that is causing a usurpation of our liberty and freedom?
So when Jake Tapper stands up, “Are you willing to compromise, Mr. President? Are you willing to compromise, maybe go $500,000 a year they get to keep the Bush tax cut, maybe a million?” And Obama, as the all-knowing, the all-whatever, “Yeah, I’ll think about it,” as though he has any right to. Who is Barack Obama to be able to say that any citizen in this country has to pay more to support his mistakes because of what they earn, and why do so many of us fall into the trap of thinking, yeah, that’s fair?
Why are so many people willing, accidentally, purposefully, to squander and give up their liberty and freedom so that they do not have to feel the guilt? What is the price of your freedom? You know, it used to be that Americans would give up their lives before they would give up their freedom. Americans would give up their lives before other people would have to give up their freedom. Americans would give their lives so that others might be free.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.