Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Mr Rogers
I agree with that. That's probably a smarter way to go. But my point is that each political party wants to wrap their arms about large parts of the budget and say "Can't touch this!" We will never get anywhere if the public perceives that the Republicans are joining in that game. The Democrats, of course, can play that game and be shielded by the media.

Republicans need to be seen as very open to all kinds of budget cuts. Now, we should not give away the store and do something stupid -- but let's not fool ourselves: cuts are coming and everyone is going to feel the pain. Let the public know that we are participating.

8 posted on 11/04/2010 9:21:23 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: ClearCase_guy; Mr Rogers

Rather than tit for tat as you guys propose how about we require the appropriation bills to cite the Constitutional authority for funding a particular endeavor? There is no doubt that true Defense appropriations can meet muster but it starts to get interesting when you consider education, welfare/entitlements, etc.


9 posted on 11/04/2010 9:35:22 AM PDT by T-Bird45 (It feels like the seventies, and it shouldn't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson