To: The Comedian
Rush is wrong on this one. While Earmarks themselves don’t account for much, the receipt of Earmarks lead to votes for large, unnecessary spending bills. They are bribes. They were responsible for both stimulus and Obamacare. That is more than $11 Trillion over the next 10 years, well more than 1%. Neither bill would have ever passed without the bribes.
To: wolfman23601
Yep, earmarks are basically taxpayers money used for the reelection of incumbents. They don’t need to go home and brag to their constituents on how much they robbed the rest of the country.
20 posted on
11/04/2010 10:55:55 AM PDT by
Brett66
(Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
To: wolfman23601
EXACTLY! Earmarks are corruption.
22 posted on
11/04/2010 11:02:49 AM PDT by
SC_Pete
To: wolfman23601
Rush is wrong on this one. While Earmarks themselves dont account for much, the receipt of Earmarks lead to votes for large, unnecessary spending bills. They are bribes. They were responsible for both stimulus and Obamacare. That is more than $11 Trillion over the next 10 years, well more than 1%. Neither bill would have ever passed without the bribes. You never refuted the original point that earmarks themselves were around only 1% of the budget.
You make a different argument, and I certainly agree with you, but it is a different point.
Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.
30 posted on
11/04/2010 12:51:52 PM PDT by
The Comedian
(I really missed you. Next time, I'll adjust for windage.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson