But ... who's gonna pay the cable newsers their subscriber fees if the cable companies have no subscribers?
But ... who's gonna pay the cable newsers their subscriber fees if the cable companies have no subscribers?
This might brighten the day of the all-TV-is-evil FReeper.
No, I canceled cable because it's nothing but 100 channels of noise. I can detune my radio and get the same amount of intelligent content and satisfaction for free.
Speaking just for myself...
No, the internet is not to blame. The smut is to blame, the internet just makes it easier to find something else to stare at when I sit down.
LOL. This dummy reporter thinks its a mystery why people are cancelling cable? I can’t stop laughing long enough to type.
How about—astronomical prices for duplicate programs and crappy content? How about being charged to “rent” equipment for the privilege of paying those astronomical prices? The list goes on and on.
Ripoff prices might explain some of the decline.
Heaven forbid they ever consider lowering prices for a service that obviously now has a more competitive market.
All they can do is offer sweetheart deals to new customers for a year or so while their existing customers who pay their bills every month continue to pay the higher rate.
Cable/Sat providers remind me a lot of the mortgage bailout models. Those who are most loyal and reliable get the shaft.
I dropped Mediacom after 20 years for two reasons - one, it became too expensive, and two, I got tired of paying for a slew of channel that I never watched. I either watch TV off-air now or over the internet.
Besides, all the good tv has already been done. And 99% of it is on youtube.com! :)
It’s simple: people can’t afford cable. If the choice is buying gasoline or paying a cable bill, most sane folk choose the gasoline.
I love the “bindle” savings scams - they save nothing. In these times, people are tightening the belt as much as they can, starting with cable.
Plus, why pay for crap, which most of TV is anyway?
2. when someone loses their home in foreclosure, they won't be paying the cable bill
3. nearly $100 per month for dozens of channels, the majority of which are garbage is not an enticing value
I have been without tv for over a year and I love it! I do have Netflix. I can also pick up free internet where I live...hahahaha!
The cable rates keep going up and the service is not all that hot. We have over 200 channels to choose from and there are nights we discover there is nothing we want to watch.
That can be a good thing, but then we are paying for it even if we don’t watch.
Currently our internet access is via the cable company but alternatives are coming so it may not be much longer before we cut the cord ourselves.
One thing that would help the cable companies, change their business model. Allow subscribers to pick and choose which channels they want. I would say there are less than 10 channels I care for out of the 200 available. Even if I had to pay for each I think it would be cheaper (of course there are both practical and legal reasons why they don’t)
We should be able to cherry pick only the channels we want to receive.
Last time I looked, it was $50 per month for a no-frills can of crap from the local cable provider. I would not subscribe if they paid me that much to have it on.
Only a perve pays to hear coprolalia.
I’ve always thought cable and satellite prices were too high. For one thing, channels with commercials should be essentially free just as they are over the air.
I am researching the little boxes you can buy to hook to your television to get video content over the internet. My main concern is that picture and sound quality must be compromised because of bandwidth restraints, but maybe I’m wrong.
Also, the companies that produce the various shows charge way too much, perhaps because they pay their talent way too much. I believe that you can have very compelling stories without expensive productions.
Does anyone have a box that they recommend, or any thoughts on TV and movies from the internet?
DirecTv doubled my bill without asking - from $29 to $65. For a basic package and no HD.
I called and they told me that I was out of the “offer” period. Nothing they could do.
Then they mailed me, emailed me, ran online and TV ads telling me Directv was $29 a month.
I called again and was told “not for you.”
I cancelled and don’t regret it. Been off cable for 2 years. Even FoxNews is about a day behind the news I get in print online. Why pay a premium for it?
Lower rates might help.
If it's not on Netflix, I can always pick it up on PirateBay.
My biggest problem with TV is actually the commercials more than anything else: they're too surreal and leave me feeling creeped out.
It’s a combination. Cable is expensive, and their customer service is horrible. If you need something fixed, you’re just as likely to get it fixed with chicken bones, feathers, and dried blood as you are with the incompetents that the cable company sends out.
My son, he’s 27, dropped cable. He downloads entire series of programs from the internet and watches them, and movies on his home media center, (he built a linux based media center).
The only thing he misses is live sports, and he can either come over to my house or go to a bar. He’s pretty happy with the alternative to cable.