Implying that the Constitution is secondary to the Creator. I think this is where this 'conflict' on the topic is premised...
Yes, the Constitution is being trampled upon by the leftist judges and politicians intent on limiting individual liberty and accumulating power...
HOWEVER, the Constitution is premised upon the Creator -specifically, what all individuals are endowed from Him.
One can not truly uphold and argue the merits of upholding the Constitution while at the same time dismissing its very premise as irrelevant, a secondary concern, or a bigoted position...
I would never contend the Constitution is secondary to the Creator. That’s putting words in my mouth.
It’s secondary in the narrower legal sense. The judge had no jurisdiction. How hard is that to figure? How hard is that to support?