I have not had another name. I have been lurking for several years now.
You seem to think gays just started joining the military yesterday.
Gays exist. Gays serve.
We lost on the DADT argument 20 years ago. This is the world we live in now.
So seriously, what is the best way to reverse this as soon as possible?
I contend it’s to smack that Federal Judge across the face with the Constitution and have her disbarred.
I also contend its in conservatives motivating their Congressmen elected representatives to act - since they have obviously abnegated their duties. We have recently shown we can hold them responsible. This is just one issue among many that contend for their attention. We need to make the best arguments possible and you can’t assume that your representative already agrees with you. You have to make that one best argument.
When you understand conservatism well enough to give me lectures on it, I’ll be the first one in line, I promise.
Rule of Law goes much further back than your temper tantrums.
And you didn't pick up on the fact that we oppose the homosexual agenda?
You seem to think gays just started joining the military yesterday.
Gays exist. Gays serve.
Oh yes, the ever-present "they're going to do it anyway, let's just legalize it" libertarian talking point.
We are a nation built on the rule of law. Laws are passed and when they are broken we have police, courts and prisons to deal with it, we do not legalize a behavior just because people are breaking the law.
We lost on the DADT argument 20 years ago. This is the world we live in now.
Not if we fight it.
So seriously, what is the best way to reverse this as soon as possible?
I contend it’s to smack that Federal Judge across the face with the Constitution and have her disbarred.
How is this going to stop Zero from issuing an executive order based on the recommendation of Gates? How is this going to stop Congress from allowing homosexuals in the military?
As an aside, making a bad ruling IS NOT a reason to remove a judge from the bench through impeachment and it in no way is grounds to have someone disbarred.
I also contend its in conservatives motivating their Congressmen elected representatives to act - since they have obviously abnegated their duties. We have recently shown we can hold them responsible. This is just one issue among many that contend for their attention. We need to make the best arguments possible and you can’t assume that your representative already agrees with you. You have to make that one best argument.
NONE of which stops an executive order.
When you understand conservatism well enough to give me lectures on it, I’ll be the first one in line, I promise.
I've seen NOTHING from you that indicates that you have any notion of what genuine conservatism is.
Rule of Law goes much further back than your temper tantrums.
Oh? Earlier you said it was the "world we live in."
A. Insulting wagglebee shows your true colors.
B. The ban on homosexuals which used to be standard (now watered down to DADT) has to do with behavior. Not self-identified "gays". A practitioner of same sex sodomy is, by behavior, prone to promsicuity, violence, risk taking, high disease rates and so on. Why should people who practice unhealthy and unnatural sex acts be allowed in the military? There is no reason other than leftist/political correctness/surrender to deviancy.
We lost on the DADT argument 20 years ago. This is the world we live in now.
Another way of saying to women who might get raped - "if it's inevitable, lie back and enjoy it". An excuse for giving up and letting evil win. As though history is an inevitable path to hell ("progress") and anyone disagreeing with the current direction is "living in the past", "trying to turn back the clock", etc. Typical leftist, moral relativist [sic] arguments. You have not one scintilla of a clue of what it means to be a conservative.