Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Time to Tackle Right to Work
The American Thinker ^ | November 08, 2010 | Bruce Walker

Posted on 11/08/2010 1:19:40 AM PST by Scanian

The 2010 landslide means that Republicans in the House can stop any new legislative initiatives by the Democrats and that Senate Republicans, if united, can stop almost anything Democrats want to do in that body as well. House Republicans can also send to the Senate bills that will put political pressure on Obama and Senate Democrats, like a complete extension of the Bush tax cuts. But at the federal level, Republicans cannot actually do anything without Democrats caving in.

The situation is very different at the state level. Republicans now control both houses of the state legislature and the governorship in a number of states. Republicans now have complete control of state government in twenty states compared to a paltry seven states before the midterm election. Crucially, Republicans now control all state government in five industrial rust belt states: Pennsylvania, Ohio, Michigan, Indiana, and Wisconsin. This control will allow Republicans to draw congressional districts and also, just as importantly, state legislative districts -- a real political blow to Democrats.

Unlike the federal government, a party that actually controls the state legislature and governorship can enact laws -- the filibuster is an odd creature almost unique to the United States Senate. There are many things Republicans in control of state governments should do: limit spending, cut tax rates, reduce regulation. But there is one reform that stout-hearted Republicans running those five rust belt states should definitely do: pass right to work laws. The Taft-Hartley Act allows each state the option of enacting right to work laws, which allow workers to not join a labor union as a condition of employment. Twenty-two states have adopted right to work laws, and these states closely resemble the twenty-two states that Obama lost in 2008. Although the leftist establishment media gets a disproportionate amount of attention from conservatives, along with risible "civil rights" leaders and surreally silly academicians, the real political muscle of the Left comes from organized labor -- meaning the bosses who run with those vast empires called "labor unions" and who use the forced dues from members to engage in constant war against conservatives.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: labormoney; states; tafthartley; unions

1 posted on 11/08/2010 1:19:45 AM PST by Scanian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Scanian

http://www.nrtw.org/rtws.htm


2 posted on 11/08/2010 1:51:56 AM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

3 posted on 11/08/2010 1:53:42 AM PST by JoeProBono (A closed mouth gathers no feet - Visualize)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

In particular, right to work laws should be passed against public unions. These exist to extract taxpayer welfare for the benefit of bureaucrats and the particular constituencies they serve. Reining them in will prevent states from running up large bills and going bankrupt.

This can be done in exchange for guaranteeing union rights for workers in the private sector. Taxpayers and workers alike should find it an attractive proposition.


4 posted on 11/08/2010 1:56:05 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoeProBono

CSA vs USA 1861. Looks similar,I'm just sayin'.

5 posted on 11/08/2010 3:48:10 AM PST by central_va (I won't be reconstructed, and I do not give a damn.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Scanian
If gay marriage can be justified by an appeal to an adults right to contract it seems clear that the same right to contract means we all live in what should be right-to-work states.

It'll be a bit of effort to get the courts to see it that way but it seems inescapable to me,

6 posted on 11/08/2010 4:32:09 AM PST by muir_redwoods (Obama. Chauncey Gardiner without the homburg.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scanian

A far more crippling and needed reform that GOP-dominated states could enact would be to simply outlaw collective bargaining by state and local government employees. Allowing public employees to unionize creates a class of “super-citizens” who enjoy the right to force the employer to sit down and “bargain in good faith” over the union’s unconscionable wage and benefit demands. The rest of the public must wait to pick up the crumbs left after the bloated civil serpents waddle off with their loot.

States should also prohibit payroll deductions from public employees paychecks for any purposes other than charitable giving, credit union and similar payments, and for the employee’s share of benefit costs. Even if the state doesn’t have the gumption to prohibit public employee unionization, make the union thugs collect their own dues.


7 posted on 11/08/2010 5:26:31 AM PST by Spartan79 (Malo periculosam libertatem quam quietam servitutem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson