No - and I concur with post #114, also answering your question: Sharia is intended to set up a competing legal system independent of our Constitutional system — all the way down to the state/local levels. Not only that, but one could successfully argue, IMHO, that a government endorsement of Sharia for Islamic peoples is tantamout to the establishment of a religion — clearly in violation of Amendment 1.
Because of both these reasons, this judge’s ruling should be vigorously appealed, and she should be impeached for blatantly failing to abide by her oath.
The thought gave me a fright. Sometimes we have to think in terms of how rulings and laws can be used. Consequences you know.
I know that not all religious practices are legal under the 1st Amendment, just thought that this might be an opening to compel objectors to perform abortions in compliance with its legality.