Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congressional analysis: Obama eligibility never was confirmed
WND ^ | NOVEMBER 8, 2010 | Jerome R. Corsi

Posted on 11/08/2010 5:11:53 PM PST by RobinMasters

A congressional document that has been posted on the Internet confirms no one – not Congress, not the states and not election officials – bothered to check Barack Obama's eligibility to be president, and in fact, that status remains undocumented to this day.

It's because state and federal law did not require anyone in Congress or elsewhere to check to see if Obama was a "natural born Citizen" under the meaning of Article 2, Section 1 of the Constitution, according the document.

The analysis by the Congressional Research Service, a research arm of the U.S. Congress, openly admits no one in the federal government, including Congress, ever asked to see Obama's long-form, hospital-generated birth certificate. In fact, it explains no one was required to do so.

Technically, the CRS is a public policy research arm of the United States Congress that is organized as a legislative branch agency within the Library of Congress; the CRS works exclusively for members of Congress, congressional committees and congressional staff in an advisory capacity, answering questions.

(Excerpt) Read more at wnd.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: birthcertificate; certifigate; eligibility; loophole; naturalborncitizen; obama; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-219 next last
To: VADoc1980
You don’t acquire Indonesian citizenship at birth by virtue of adoption, but you do acquire U.S. citizenship at the moment of birth if you are born in this country.

Sorry, but you're wrong on both accounts. Indonesia law makes adopted children up to age 5 automatic citizens of Indonesia. As for your second point, not all persons born in the United States automatically become U.S. citizens.

181 posted on 11/09/2010 2:02:01 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: edge919

Yes, adopted children become automatic citizens, but they don’t acquire that ciizenship at the moment of BIRTH. That’s what I’m saying.


182 posted on 11/09/2010 2:07:34 PM PST by VADoc1980
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 181 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters
It's OK, no need to verify anything.

He's part black.


Frowning takes 68 muscles.
Smiling takes 6.
Pulling this trigger takes 2.
I'm lazy.

183 posted on 11/09/2010 2:10:49 PM PST by The Comedian (I really missed you. Next time, I'll adjust for windage.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VADoc1980
Yes, adopted children become automatic citizens, but they don’t acquire that ciizenship at the moment of BIRTH. That’s what I’m saying.

It doesn't exactly matter. Do you have a point??

184 posted on 11/09/2010 2:13:39 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: edge919

I do. Even if he was adopted by his Indonesian stepfather, I don’t think that would negate his U.S. citizenship. He wasn’t of an age to renounce it and I think that if he was a citizen at birth, then he maintained it by returning to the United States as a minor.


185 posted on 11/09/2010 2:37:11 PM PST by VADoc1980
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies]

To: VADoc1980
I do. Even if he was adopted by his Indonesian stepfather, I don’t think that would negate his U.S. citizenship. He wasn’t of an age to renounce it and I think that if he was a citizen at birth, then he maintained it by returning to the United States as a minor.

The law in effect at the time Obama would have been adopted would not have precluded him from denouncing U.S. citizenship (providing he ever had it). Indonesian law didn't recognize dual citizenship, so it's within reason to think that Obama considered himself to be an Indonesian citizen. We know there's a school record from Indonesia that lists him as an Indonesian citizen, so the best available evidence tells us he was an Indonesian citizen. What we don't have is evidence of U.S. citizenship being restored afterwards.

186 posted on 11/09/2010 2:44:39 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 185 | View Replies]

To: edge919

He was what, five? I don’t think minors can renounce their citizenship. Where’s the evidence that he renounced his citizenship anyway? Leaving the country for a few years to attend school in Indonesia is not even close to prima facie evidence that he renounced his citizenship.


187 posted on 11/09/2010 3:08:37 PM PST by VADoc1980
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 186 | View Replies]

To: VADoc1980

It might be interesting to see his school transcripts from his prep school in Hawaii or Occidental College or Columbia University, to see if any of them listed him as a foreign student or gave him financial aid earmarked for foreign students only.


188 posted on 11/09/2010 3:40:06 PM PST by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: Verginius Rufus

I’m sure he got plenty of aid because of his racial background. I doubt he needed any additional foreign aid. Doesn’t pretty much every university out there reserve a specific percentage of internal grants and scholarships for minority students only? I know mine did.


189 posted on 11/09/2010 4:57:35 PM PST by VADoc1980
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 188 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
According to the courts so far, nobody has "standing" to verify that Obama meets the eligibility requirements.

More patently jackass mandates from the tyrannical, corrupt "men in black."

190 posted on 11/09/2010 5:33:21 PM PST by GregoryFul (Obama - Jim Jones redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: MamaDearest

Yup, a worldwide joke on the stupidity of the abominable Americans. Kenyan, and Muslim, and a documented, certifiable America hater. And orgasmic, ecstatic thoughts of Him just run a thrill up the legs of the sniveling abominable American.


191 posted on 11/09/2010 5:41:12 PM PST by GregoryFul (Obama - Jim Jones redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
The DNC apparently should have certified that Obama was qualified and eligible. However, apparently, they changed the certification statement to omit the specification of being eligible to occupy the office. The absent press should have broadcast that omission - but being in the bag, it wasn't in their interest.

It is clear that in this country, we have now become encumbered with a thoroughly corrupt, deceitful, amoral, tyrannical leadership. Only the people acting in a mass unrelenting movement can correct the situation, and blood will flow before any correction can be achieved.

192 posted on 11/09/2010 5:59:54 PM PST by GregoryFul (Obama - Jim Jones redux)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: GregoryFul

In the final analysis the “men in black” seem to rule the US. Are they subjected to checks and balances?


193 posted on 11/09/2010 7:06:23 PM PST by 353FMG (In the end, it will be either ISLAM or America -- it cannot be both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 190 | View Replies]

To: VADoc1980
He was what, five? I don’t think minors can renounce their citizenship.

First, we don't know what citizenship little Barry had. There's no, how do you say it, prima facie evidence of his citizenship. Second, U.S. law at the time little Barry would have been adopted did NOT preclude minors from renouncing their citizenship.

Leaving the country for a few years to attend school in Indonesia is not even close to prima facie evidence that he renounced his citizenship.

Doesn't matter. The best available evidence from that time period says Obama was an Indonesian citizen. Indonesia doesn't allow dual citizenship, so we have to assume that Obama thought of himself as an Indonesian citizen only. On his return to the United States, we have no evidence that he restored or reapplied for U.S. citizenship.

194 posted on 11/09/2010 9:04:33 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 187 | View Replies]

To: edge919
First, we don't know what citizenship little Barry had. There's no, how do you say it, prima facie evidence of his citizenship

Oh, I think the birth notices printed in the Honolulu papers are pretty strong prima facie evidence that Barry was born in Hawaii. So is the COLB. If he was born in Hawaii then he's a citizen. It doesn't matter that he lived in Indonesia. You're not going to convince anyone outside of the birther crew that five or si year old Barry renounced his citizenship to a consular officer, and it's clear that the parents cannot renounce citizenship on behalf of the minor.

Second, U.S. law at the time little Barry would have been adopted did NOT preclude minors from renouncing their citizenship.

I think I'm going to need a source for this claim, especially considering this:

This is right from the State Dept website:

"F. RENUNCIATION FOR MINOR CHILDREN

Parents cannot renounce U.S. citizenship on behalf of their minor children. Before an oath of renunciation will be administered under Section 349(a)(5) of the INA, a person under the age of eighteen must convince a U.S. diplomatic or consular officer that he/she fully understands the nature and consequences of the oath of renunciation, is not subject to duress or undue influence, and is voluntarily seeking to renounce his/her U.S. citizenship. "

You're saying that little Barry convinced a U.S. diplomatic officer that he fully understood the nature and consequences of renunciation? Because parents cannot renounce it on behalf of their minor children. You're grasping at straws.

195 posted on 11/09/2010 10:11:45 PM PST by VADoc1980
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 194 | View Replies]

To: VADoc1980
Oh, I think the birth notices printed in the Honolulu papers are pretty strong prima facie evidence that Barry was born in Hawaii.

Ummmm, none of the birth announcements actually say he was born in Hawaii. Sorry, at best it proves a date of birth, gender, father and a permanent mailing address.

So is the COLB.

A legitimate hard copy of a COLB would be prima facie evidence if presented in a court of law, but despite several opportunities, it has NEVER been presented.

If he was born in Hawaii then he's a citizen.

He might be a 14th amendment citizen, but not a natural born citizen, which is the actual requirement to hold the office of POTUS.

It doesn't matter that he lived in Indonesia.

It's not a simple matter of JUST living in Indonesia, but possibly being adopted and AUTOMATICALLY becoming an Indonesian citizen.

You're not going to convince anyone outside of the birther crew that five or si year old Barry renounced his citizenship to a consular officer, and it's clear that the parents cannot renounce citizenship on behalf of the minor.

I repeat. The BEST evidence available for this time period in Barry's life says he was an Indonesian citizen. The burden would be on him to prove that he ever had U.S. citizenship and regained or retained it. So far, no evidence has been presented.

This is right from the State Dept website:

There's no doubt that the current laws are more protective of children's citizenship than they were when Obama would have been adopted. The law was different then. It was changed in 1986. This means that up to his adulthood, Obama may have considered himself to be an Indonesian citizen.

196 posted on 11/09/2010 10:27:39 PM PST by edge919
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies]

To: RobinMasters

I just sent the following to my State Senator. No sense sending it to my Dem State Rep because she’s been term limited and will be gone come January.>>>

Most people assume that Barack Obama had been vetted before he was able to run for President. Guess what?
A congressional document posted on the Internet confirms no one – not Congress, not the states and not election officials – bothered to check Barack Obama’s eligibility to be president, and that status remains undocumented to this day.

http://www.wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=225561

http://www.scribd.com/doc/41131059/CRS-Congressional-Internal-Memo-What-to-Tell-Your-Constituents-Regarding-Obama-Eligibility-Questions

And since the Federal government failed to vet Obama, maybe the states should do their job for them. Missouri must pass a law that would require that all candidates meet the eligibility requirements before being placed on the ballot. That means presidential candidates must present an official certified birth certificate to each political party in the state. You had to provide a birth certificate in order to run for the MO Senate so why shouldn’t presidential candidates do likewise?

#####

You may consider writing to your state legislators also.


197 posted on 11/10/2010 7:34:21 PM PST by Jonah Vark (Any 5th grader knows that the Constitution declares the separation of powers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VADoc1980

Hey doc!

If it takes a law (statute, amendment) to make you a citizen, you are not a “natural born” citizen.

It’s that simple.

A “natural born” citizen” just is.


198 posted on 11/11/2010 12:17:25 PM PST by Beckwith (A "natural born citizen" -- two American citizen parents and born in the USA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 118 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
Hey doc!

If it takes a law (statute, amendment) to make you a citizen, you are not a “natural born” citizen.

It’s that simple.

A “natural born” citizen” just is.

Hi Beckwith. It isn't that simple.

The 14th amendment is not just a statute, it's part of our Constitution. It was added in 1868. Opinions about what it should take to be considered a "natural born" citizen are fine. If you want to prevent people born in the United States to non-citizen parents from being eligible for the Presidency, then pass a Constitutional amendment repealing that part of the 14th. To imply that an amendment means nothing is incorrect. Your argument seems to boil down to knowing a natural-born citizen when you see one, and that doesn't really have any basis in law.

199 posted on 11/11/2010 12:24:41 PM PST by VADoc1980
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]

To: Beckwith
The Michigan Law Review paper cited in that post of mine you responded to made the same point:

"Those born in the United States are uncontroversially natural born citizens."

I don't see any conditions in that sentence Beckwith, and no cites follow it, because it's understood by the general legal community to be true.

200 posted on 11/11/2010 12:26:18 PM PST by VADoc1980
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 198 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 141-160161-180181-200201-219 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson