Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeattleBruce
If I can't make a phonetic understanding of the name, I say no

Arbitrary and subjective decision. Didn't SCOTUS stop the Bush-Gore recounts for exactly this reason?

51 posted on 11/11/2010 7:17:19 AM PST by 6ppc (It's torch and pitchfork time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: 6ppc

As has been noted on this thread, the fact that Alaska allowed into the polling booths a list with the name spelled accurately means that to now apply some leeway judgment is unlawful by the Gore v Bush SCOTUS standard! Allowing an arbitrary judgment after the fact is not lawful. It may be merciful, but it certainly isn’t lawful.


56 posted on 11/11/2010 7:21:50 AM PST by MHGinTN (Some, believing they can't be deceived, it's nigh impossible to convince them when they're deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson