Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: NTHockey
IMHO, the RINOs avaided having three very vocal and well-covered Conservatives in office by not backing them (O'Donnel, Angle, and Miller). Had they done so, they would have had three popular Conservatives in the way of getting 'moderate' (liberal, let's call a spade a spade shall we?) people in those offices. By not fully backing them in those races, and even siding with their opponents, RINOs hurt the Conservatives.

One of these flipping days people are going to realize the Conservatives are only of use to the Republican Party as long as they aren't on the ticket.

While that needs to change, I've been sick and tired of getting chucked under the bus on Election Day +1 for well over a decade.

As far as I am concerned, the Republican Establishment showed its true colors by not fully backing people on the GOP ticket, and even supporting their opponents.

Heads should roll over that, but instead we're getting bidness as usual.

15 posted on 11/12/2010 3:31:36 PM PST by Smokin' Joe (How often God must weep at humans' folly. Stand fast. God knows what He is doing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]


To: Smokin' Joe

>>As far as I am concerned, the Republican Establishment showed its true colors by not fully backing people on the GOP ticket, and even supporting their opponents.

Heads should roll over that, but instead we’re getting bidness as usual.<<

It’s already started. It’s already started.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2624260/posts


16 posted on 11/13/2010 2:43:51 AM PST by NTHockey (Rules of engagement #1: Take no prisoners)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson