Ban-happy SF targets male circumcision

Washington Examiner ^ | 11/12/2010 | Joshua Sabatini

[Rashputin]

Well, they're officially Nazis now.

[ColdOne]

You may be correct. Post 38.

[Rashputin]

Perhaps these freaks have gotten this procedure confused with Happy Meals."

Actually, this is an extension of the McDonald's' regulations in that it ensures privately served Happy Meals are all natural.

Regards

[Truth is a Weapon]

How is this going to sit with their butt buddys the mooslims? How can they keep sucking up to them and ban a religious practice? How can they continue with their implementation of Sharia law in SF if the city council does stupid things like this?

Why did they only rule about male circumcision? Aren’t they concerned about female genital mutilation?

[Gator113]

LOL...

Cheers

[668 - Neighbor of the Beast]

"If you're against abortion circumcision, just don't have one."

[668 - Neighbor of the Beast]

“It’s just tissue.”

[RichInOC]

Okay, first, I originally saw this on my iPhone and thought it said “Bun-happy”.

Second...what about the inalienable right of each and every teenage San Franciscan to get a Prince Albert? This oppression will not stand.

[DPMD]

...As well as forced female circumcision, provided it’s practiced as a religious ritual by those in the religion of peace.

[Wuli]

And who still thinks that “progressives” and Nazis (national socialists) are not “birds of a feather”?

[FrogMom]

And Judaism.

[Lurking Libertarian]

And Judaism.

Of course. I was just responding to the suggestion, above, that this targets Jews and not Muslims.

[greatplains]

Soooo glad I wasn’t eating or drinking at the time...

[goat granny]

I’m old and don’t care anymore???? I learned that expression from the guys on Free Republic....blame them...:O)

[Slings and Arrows]

It won't do them any good to fine the mohels - they work for tips.

[ReignOfError]

[Mr. Silverback]

I strongly oppose circumcision, but this is just more fascism from the “we know better” crowd.

[Scythian]

The reason why they want to ban it is because men without a Circumcision have a much higher rate of HIV. Thier goal (radical lefty gays) is to have a much higher rate of transfer.

[LibertyRocks]

Wouldn’t this qualify as discrimination against Jews?

[LibertyRocks]

Thanks to Obamacare that is essentially the case, is it not? They’re all hypocrites as well - after years of chanting “keep your laws off our bodies”. It makes it that much worse, IMHO.