Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Red-Light Cameras Shut Off Monday
Click2Houston ^ | November 12, 2010

Posted on 11/12/2010 6:47:25 PM PST by speciallybland

Houston's red-light cameras will go dark on Monday morning, officials said Friday.

Houstonians voted to end the use of red-light cameras in Proposition 3 on Election Day. The election results will be certified Monday.

City officials asked the contractor for Houston's 70 red-light cameras to turn them off Monday.

"We absolutely respect the outcome of the election. ATS has ageed to abide by the city's request that the cameras go dark at 10 o'clock on Monday morning," said George Hittner, the vice president of American Traffic Solutions.

He said the city sent him a letter asking his company to turn off the cameras Monday morning, when the election results will become official. American Traffic Solutions responded with a letter agreeing to end the cameras.

(Excerpt) Read more at click2houston.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: redlightcameras; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

1 posted on 11/12/2010 6:47:29 PM PST by speciallybland
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

I can’t believe the voting was that close. 53?-47%


2 posted on 11/12/2010 6:52:07 PM PST by VA_Gentleman ("Poor Al Gore. Global warming completely debunked via the very internet you invented." -Jon Stewart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VA_Gentleman

Excellent. For decades the simple traffic light serves a useful purpose. That local govt. Wants cameras to collect revenue is a sham and some locales have tried to trick the drivers by altering the yellow light time sequences in efforts to catch and fine more unsuspecting citizens.


3 posted on 11/12/2010 7:00:13 PM PST by tflabo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

The city sure replied and acted quickly to shut down and remove them.....must have been costing them a bundle to maintain and monitor. Funny how money works. Good riddance, by the way.


4 posted on 11/12/2010 7:02:51 PM PST by CanaGuy (Go Harper! We still love you!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland
It's too bad we couldn't use that same proposition to fire the bastards who put those cameras up in the first place. Houston has had automated speed traps in the past and the courts shut them down. The city had to know this wasn't going to fly. Sorry bastards!

...growling and scaring my dog right now.

5 posted on 11/12/2010 7:08:23 PM PST by SeeSharp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

Good riddance!


6 posted on 11/12/2010 7:08:42 PM PST by BlueAngel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

When Texans found out that out-of-state monitoring companies were getting 2/3 of the revenue from $75 tickets, they voted against the cameras. It certainly wasn’t worth it, and it made no difference to traffic safety.


7 posted on 11/12/2010 7:09:03 PM PST by kittymyrib
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

YIPPEE!!!


8 posted on 11/12/2010 7:10:08 PM PST by shield (A wise man's heart is at his RIGHT hand;but a fool's heart at his LEFT. Ecc 10:2)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

Watch for them to show up on Ebay or maybe craigslist.


9 posted on 11/12/2010 7:11:03 PM PST by Past Your Eyes (I'd open it myself but I don't have any thumbs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

I don’t care if the tickets’ revenues went to an in-state orphanage. I don’t want any damn nanny state cameras! This isn’t Great Britain!


10 posted on 11/12/2010 7:18:15 PM PST by Dan Nunn (Support the NRA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: VA_Gentleman
I can’t believe the voting was that close. 53?-47%

I'm guessing you've never driven in Houston...

11 posted on 11/12/2010 7:20:10 PM PST by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: kittymyrib

That’s right.
When anyone at city hall was interviewed about this after the election they only commented on the loss of revenue, not the public safety issue. It’s all about the $$.


12 posted on 11/12/2010 7:25:02 PM PST by texaschick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland
I voted for the cameras and was hoping they would remain and people would learn to respect the red lights.

In 1984 our 18 year old son was broad sided at a freeway intersection. He was killed instantly. All you folks who are joyously celebrating the removal, I hope you don't ever have to go through what we have been through just because someone didn't want to stop for a red light.

13 posted on 11/12/2010 7:25:07 PM PST by Ditter (/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VA_Gentleman

You weren’t here. They called them “Red Light Safety Cameras” as if the camera would keep you from getting hurt by a red light runner. LOL.


14 posted on 11/12/2010 7:30:06 PM PST by BobL (The whole point of being human is knowing when the party's over.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

I am very sorry for your loss, Ditter.


15 posted on 11/12/2010 7:33:34 PM PST by slouch-no-more
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: r9etb

Some of THE WORST drivers in the world. Drivers consider red lights as “driving suggestions,” sort of like the parsley on the fish sticks package is a “serving suggestion.” At one light in the Rice University area, I routinely sat there after the light turned green, waiting for the first two red light runners to pass, before proceeding through the intersection. It’s not just that these scofflaws are in a hurry; they actually think stopping for red lights is optional.


16 posted on 11/12/2010 7:39:01 PM PST by giotto
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
John Stossel had a program where a guy from the UK was promoting round a bouts. Much safer that the light system(except for very large multi lane intersections.

They always work, though it takes about 6 months for people to get the hang of them. We have some in our town and they work great, and no maintenance, 10% of the cost, and much better safety record.

17 posted on 11/12/2010 7:52:03 PM PST by stubernx98 (cranky, but reasonable)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: speciallybland

Good. Next step. Take them down.


18 posted on 11/12/2010 8:00:55 PM PST by freekitty (Give me back my conservative vote; then find me a real conservative to vote for)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ditter

My mother was killed in a car wreck and I do NOT endorse these cameras. They will save no lives and may actually cause more accidents from rear end collisions.

Whoring out cash to the government at any level does not make a personal loss any better. It only diminishes them but using their loss in vain.


19 posted on 11/12/2010 8:05:10 PM PST by packrat35 (I got your tag line..)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ditter
"In 1984 our 18 year old son was broad sided at a freeway intersection. He was killed instantly. All you folks who are joyously celebrating the removal, I hope you don't ever have to go through what we have been through just because someone didn't want to stop for a red light."

This is a touchy subject for you, for obvious reasons, but your justification for these devices is identical to that used by the anti-gunners to destroy our 2nd Amendment rights. Because some break the law or are careless, all must be punished and have their freedom curtailed. Nothing will change your opinion because for you this all about your loss and is an emotional response. Same for Sarah Brady. I can only hope that a majority of people will think clearly and not be swayed by emotional arguments. These cameras must go.

20 posted on 11/12/2010 8:06:52 PM PST by Batrachian (Celebrating 10 years with Free Republic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson