Replies

While their at it, they can look at the science that says breathing is polluting (CO2).

Citation, please.

They have never stated such. Please point to where the relevant text would include breathing as a case where it is considered polluting.

Micturation is a natural human bodily function, but you wouldn't want it directed at your beer. Context is everything.

The EPA's finding doesn't say carbon dioxide, or CO2, is by itself a pollutant -- it is, after all, a gas that humans exhale and plants inhale. Rather, it is the increasing concentrations of the gas that concern the agency.
--Wall Street Journal, "How Carbon Dioxide Became a Pollutant," April 18, 2008.

That law was signed by President Bush, and it has nothing to do with breathing. I've read it multiple times--have you?

§7521 is called "Emission standards for new motor vehicles or new motor vehicle engines."

Oh, wait... I guess if your nickname is motor-mouth, you could get confused. ;-)

In summary, let's keep it honest and leave the exaggeration and misrepresentation to the libs, please.

BTW, when the EPA released its SCOTUS-mandated findings, they also included methane. Why did you single out carbon dioxide?

If I breath out carbon dioxide and my car puts out carbon dioxide if I were to compare the molecule from each would there be any difference? The whole notion of Carbon Dioxide as a pollutant is worse than bogus. Carbon dioxide is ESSENTIAL to life. Life craves it. It is less than one part per thousand because plants have become so effective at pulling it out from the air!

I breathe out a gram of CO2 every breath. The point of the comment is that there are many more sources of the evil gas than is accounted for in the EPA’s highly idealogical findings. And if you want to go all in with Methane, the Feds funded a study on cow digestion for $700,000. They are getting to that subject if they have the time.

Use your own lying eyes to gauge any destruction of the earth since Paul Erlich predicted our demise in 1974. Myl assertion is that the entire ecological movement is based on lies and adolescent emotionalism. It’s never been seriously challenged and tested by any rational metric. Until now.

" it is the increasing concentrations of the gas that concern the agency."

It is a socialist war on capitalism via carbon.

It is carbon they are after, in any form. The control of carbon, energy.

Normal people are not fooled by leftist Fabian/stealth efforts.

The House oversight committee needs to get the energy political agenda commissar, Carol "Director of Socialists International" in front of it.

yitbos