[Bullpine]

It appears Scientific American readers truly see the Inconvenient Truth.

[Reily]

I stopped subscribing to Scientific American during the Reagan years. It seemed every month they would have an article from a group of political scientists (or the occasional “hard” scientist who had gone “political”!) that Reagan's deployment of Pershings to Europe would start the 3rd World War with the USSR.

Well I must have slept through that war or was out for coffee when it happened. Also apparently someone lost the USSR! I can't find it on a map anymore.

All that proves that the term political science is any oxymoron!

[dennisw]

Very nice but I’ll bet the numbers would have been higher a few years ago when the economy was better. When the economy stinks and your college grad student is living at home and delivering pizza because he can’t get any better.... This tends to sharpen your mind and makes you want to have nothing to do with paying higher energy prices to make some eco-extremest happy

[EternalVigilance]

Danged climate keeps changing here in Iowa. Snowed last night. Real folks call it “weather.”

[Tolerance Sucks Rocks]

It appears Scientific American readers truly see the Inconvenient Truth.

Either that, or the poll was FReeped.

DOOMAGE!

Global Warming PING!

You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.

Freep-mail me to get on or off: Add me / Remove me

Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.

Global Warming on Free Republic

Latest from Global Warming News

Latest from Real Climate

Latest from Climate Depot

Latest from Greenie Watch

[ApplegateRanch]

and finally 80% of the leftists said they would pay nothing to forestall the risk of catastrophic climate change.

Was this referring to their sacred, hard begged personal money; or to free federal money?