Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: palmer
There is simply no other explanation than nature absorbs about 1/2 of what man generates.

That might be true if man were the only generator of CO2. Consider this alternative hypothesis.

The earth gradually warms because of a more active sun. That temperature rise affects some of the natural processes that absorb or desorb CO2. Higher water temperatures at the sea surface near the equator could well increase the rate at which CO2 is released from the sea while warmer sea temperatures at near the poles cause less CO2 to be absorbed by the ocean.

That has been proposed as a mechanism to explain why CO2 peaks in ice cores follow temperature peaks by many hundreds of years. Dissolved CO2 is transported from cold waters near the poles to equatorial waters by very slow deep water currents that take hundreds of years to go the distance.

In such a case CO2 levels are not the driver of global temperature but the result of fluctuating global temperatures, and imbalance in CO2 absorption/desorption rates would be the norm for much of the time.

There could be other mechanisms at play here that also affect CO2 absorption and desorption. Perhaps higher temperatures cause CO2 to be released by clathrate structures (hydrates) in the seafloor sediments or in similar clathrates on land in cold regions. This greater release of CO2 could greater than the sea and the flora can absorb, so the CO2 levels go up in the atmosphere.

62 posted on 11/15/2010 7:52:12 AM PST by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies ]


To: rustbucket
Over the longer run, you are right, the oceans will absorb and release CO2 according to their temperature. However the effect is small. Consider the changes in sea surface temperatures http://www.drroyspencer.com/2010/07/global-sea-surface-temperature-update-the-cooling-continues/. We would be seeing a large drop in CO2 because a cooler sea surface would absorb the CO2. To some extent it is true

there is a small downward blip in CO2 in 2008 with cooler SST when adjusted for seasonal variations. But note that the biggest seasonal factor is vegetation not SST. The northern hemisphere has a lot of land area with vegetation absorbing CO2 from spring through fall. Not so in the SH.
63 posted on 11/15/2010 10:42:44 AM PST by palmer (Cooperating with Obama = helping him extend the depression and implement socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson