Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mom upset about 12-yr old daughter's full body security scan experience
abc2news.com ^ | 7.21.2010 | David Kosin

Posted on 11/14/2010 7:44:39 PM PST by rawhide

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last
To: UnbelievingScumOnTheOtherSide

Wonder if we can combine the scanning at the airport with our annual mammograms? Save time and money. LOL


81 posted on 11/15/2010 10:27:02 AM PST by ExTexasRedhead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr
Yes, but you know that there is a selection process now in place. It may be random, it may be discretionary, but TSA employees decide who goes through the full body scan or not.

If one opts put of the full body scan, one is subject to a pat down that is far more rigorous than the one you have described.

I can do pat downs. I am trained in it,and there are various levels, dependng on the persons qualities you are searchng. An inmate of a prison who knows how to secret things about his body is treated much differently than say person who is arrested for DUI. The current pat down is quite rigorous, and the areas behind the scrotum are pressed for hard objects, along with the butt crack being pressed or fingered.
Now this rigorous search can be down quickly and innocuously if done professionally, but it seems the TSA staff are not trained well and they are clumsy.

Also you can imagine whether discretion would be exercised to pat down a woman in a burqua with her husband present? That violates every tenet of an orthodox Muslim faith and its culture. It is unlikely given the discretionary nature of such TSA classifications, and this needs clarification.

I have no objection to a rigorous pat down, but I do have a problem with it if it is not applied across the board to all racial and ethnic groups.If there is a functional exemption for Muslims, then I protest vigorously.It would fly in the face of the defined “security concerns” of Homeland Security and the TSA.

82 posted on 11/15/2010 10:45:10 AM PST by Candor7 (Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_ipthe_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG

Well, can’t have em stayin anywhere there’s any valuable resources, otherwise they’ll be back in another few hundred years. Won’t work, you don’t exile a mad dog.


83 posted on 11/15/2010 11:08:32 AM PST by dusttoyou (Let the other side get all wee-wee'd up, Foc nobama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: dusttoyou

My wish has always been that they be converted. If that is impossible, let them live together in one place and not bother the rest of us. We don’t need their oil — we have plenty of it if we have the desire to develop it ourselves.

Besides, they can’t develop their own oil wealth without the help of the non-muslim world. Islam is a curse, even on muslims.


84 posted on 11/15/2010 12:18:46 PM PST by 353FMG (In the end, it will be either ISLAM or America -- it cannot be both.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Innocuously? Are you serious? Stroking my sac and fingering my behind are not in any way innocuous. You and your ilk deserve the police state you’ll get with that attitude. This is America - learn the rules.


85 posted on 11/15/2010 12:59:49 PM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: 353FMG
We, the USA, could quit buying any oil from muslim countries and the Europeans and Chinese would still be pouring money on them to which they use against us. As long as there is a need for oil and they have any oil, it fuel their fire against non-muslims. Count on it!

Trying to be nice is nice, but folks like liberals and muslims will take advantage of this “perceived” weakness much to our detriment.

86 posted on 11/15/2010 1:14:09 PM PST by dusttoyou (Let the other side get all wee-wee'd up, Foc nobama)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: 1951Boomer

a picture, no matter how explicit, of a child is not necessarily pornographic....if the child isn’t doing anythibg sexual it can hardly be considered porno.....check out nudist sites on your computer, people of all ages but no porno


87 posted on 11/15/2010 3:04:30 PM PST by terycarl (interested and informed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Candor7

Of course the personnel at the location are going to use their discretion as to who gets patted down or not, how else would it be done?. Time constraints will not allow for every person to be individually searched. That’s the reason for the scanner, isn’t it? To check more people in less time.


88 posted on 11/15/2010 6:17:12 PM PST by stuartcr (When politicians politicize issues, aren't they just doing their job?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

Hwy, son;t blameme. LOL. THese are regular police frisks employed when ever a suspect is arrested.

Obviously you are a law abding citizen. So am I , but I served as a law enforcement officer, so I am not as sensitive about a frisk being an invasion of privacy.

But I love freedom as much as anyone. My beef is that there be no exemptions for Muslims in a burqa , for example, and also that TSA personnel should be much better trained.I think them unenessarily clumsy.

You are living in a liberal fascist police state, BTW, from the first moment Obama took office. Its taken two years for the word to get out.Where do you think all this is coming from? Santa Claus?

I can’t get too upset about the frisk though, I am more comcerned about Obama’s murdering hit team in Chicago and Washington , DC.

You won’t stop the police state by protesting frisking, you need a much more serious target for that,like the president himself.Its actually quite humorous, like a dog biting the stick that is beating him , rather than the person holding the stick itself.


89 posted on 11/15/2010 11:49:14 PM PST by Candor7 (Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_ipthe_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Candor7
Your point is prudent, but the crux is being arrested. I am not being arrested in the airport.

You are living in a liberal fascist police state, BTW

Don't I know it. We've been moving that direction before there was an Obamanation.

90 posted on 11/16/2010 6:12:47 AM PST by numberonepal (Don't Even Think About Treading On Me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: stuartcr

Frequent traveler? Some of us have to fly a lot more than once a month and it is getting totally insane. They haven’t used the back of the hand type search for a while, there are two different types of xray machines and the pat downs are invasive.


91 posted on 11/16/2010 6:26:19 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: riri

Children aren’t supposed to go through the xray machines. Kids and pregnant women shouldn’t be exposed to the radiation.


92 posted on 11/16/2010 6:28:33 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ExTexasRedhead

Annual mammograms? A thing of the past. They’re cutting healthcare jso they can pay for airport screenings. Insane.


93 posted on 11/16/2010 6:30:55 AM PST by ladyjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: ladyjane

OK, I guess we just haven’t had the same experiences...we must be different people.


94 posted on 11/16/2010 7:25:44 AM PST by stuartcr (When politicians politicize issues, aren't they just doing their job?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: numberonepal

I agree, being arrested at an airport in really superfluous.

UNLESS it is done by almost everybody at the same time, as a wide ranging act of civil disobedience, Satyagraha ( Ghandi)style, accompanied by a demand for he re-embursement of all air-fares, pursuant to the 4th amendment.

Good way to start a federal law suit IMHO.

“The right of the people to be secure in their persons”


95 posted on 11/16/2010 10:33:31 AM PST by Candor7 (Obama . fascist info..http://www.americanthinker.com/2009/05/barack_obama_ipthe_quintessentia_1.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-95 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson