Skip to comments.
In-state tuition for illegal immigrants is preserved with California Supreme Court ruling [Updated]
LA Times ^
| 15 NOV 2010
| Maura Dolan
Posted on 11/15/2010 11:06:45 AM PST by Hoodat
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
I am now boycotting anything from California. I now ask at the grocery store before purchasing produce. And my wife has just crossed San Diego off a list of possible convention sites for her industry.
1
posted on
11/15/2010 11:06:52 AM PST
by
Hoodat
To: Hoodat
Shocking development in Kalifornia
2
posted on
11/15/2010 11:09:06 AM PST
by
DAC21
To: Hoodat
It seems that after this ruling that out of state students should demand the same rights as illegal aliens and pay only the in-state tuition rate. After all, isn’t equal protection under the law in effect here?
3
posted on
11/15/2010 11:19:54 AM PST
by
The Sons of Liberty
(Psalm 109:8 Let his days be few and let another take his office. - Mene, Mene, Tekel, Upharsin)
To: DAC21
Easy solution for out of state students, lie and say you are illegal.
4
posted on
11/15/2010 11:20:28 AM PST
by
ully2
(ully)
To: ully2
[ Easy solution for out of state students, lie and say you are illegal. ]
Hey it worked for the TOTUS, he claimed he was indonesian so he could get immigrant grant money. (One of the reasons his school financial aid records are sealed).
5
posted on
11/15/2010 11:23:20 AM PST
by
GraceG
To: Hoodat
6
posted on
11/15/2010 11:23:42 AM PST
by
Excellence
(Buy Progresso, take off the label, write "not halal," mail to Campbell's soup company.)
To: Excellence
Seal the borders of California and let them simmer in their own stew.
To: Hoodat
So another words, if I am a resident of Pennsylvania (I am) and want to go to University of California (system) than I have to pay the additional cost but those from Mexico do not. I think if I was a college aged student (I am not anymore), I would challenge this law by saying I am an Illegal Alien from Pennsylvania. If more students did this, it might just work.....lol.
To: napscoordinator
I think the court is saying is that if you are a resident of Pennsylvania who happened to have (illegally) graduated from a California High School, only then would you be eligible for in-state tuition. That’s the pretense of consistency that this court decision offers. Of course there’s no logical reason why someone from Pennsylvania would illegally attend high school in California, but there is a huge incentive for someone who entered this country illegally to get a free high school education in California. And that incentive has just increased substantially with the offer of subsidized college education costs.
9
posted on
11/15/2010 11:40:08 AM PST
by
Hoodat
( .For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
To: Hoodat
Justice Ming Chin, a Pete Wilson appointed Judge was also one we at the ranch voted against this past election cycle, due to his Liberal perspectives. I don’t know at this point if this “Judge” was voted out, or not, but as Californian’s as a rule vote the opposite of Mrs. RQSR, and myself, I’d bet he still rides his pony.
10
posted on
11/15/2010 11:40:15 AM PST
by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: Hoodat
I found the information. Justice Ming Chin was retained by the electorate of California by 62% vote.
11
posted on
11/15/2010 11:47:39 AM PST
by
rockinqsranch
(Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
To: Hoodat
California just boggles the mind on everything they do. ILLEGALS should not be allowed in schools or colleges AT ALL.
12
posted on
11/15/2010 11:50:32 AM PST
by
sigzero
To: ully2
Won’t work; you’d have to lie and say that you went to high school in California for at least 3 years.
13
posted on
11/15/2010 11:53:27 AM PST
by
AuH2ORepublican
(If a politician won't protect innocent babies, what makes you think that he'll protect your rights?)
To: Hoodat
CA will go over the economic cliff all while spending $10+ billion per year on illegals.
14
posted on
11/15/2010 12:05:55 PM PST
by
umgud
To: Hoodat
I’m kind of surprised this case was even heard in California, if the description here is accurate. How can a California state court render a decision on whether a state policy conflicts with Federal law? Doesn’t this case belong in the Federal court system?
15
posted on
11/15/2010 12:17:27 PM PST
by
Alberta's Child
("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
To: Alberta's Child
Good point - (and good tagline.)
"Don't touch my junk, Bro!"
16
posted on
11/15/2010 12:23:14 PM PST
by
Hoodat
( .For the weapons of our warfare are mighty in God for pulling down strongholds.)
To: Hoodat
Can and will this be appealed?
17
posted on
11/15/2010 12:28:11 PM PST
by
johnthebaptistmoore
(If leftist legislation that's already in place really can't be ended by non-leftists, then what?)
To: Hoodat
I will never understand how the “illegal” part doesn’t get them deported. Seriously, if that mindset is acceptable what else matters?
To: Hoodat
Being a legal citizen earns you zip in this nation.
How far we have come .. towards a socialist state.
.. and thugs in black robes could care less who pays in the long run. They got theirs.
19
posted on
11/15/2010 12:29:09 PM PST
by
NormsRevenge
(Semper Fi ... Godspeed .. Monthly Donor Onboard .. Obama: Epic Fail or Bust!!!)
To: Hoodat
why should I have to obey the law when they don’t have too?
20
posted on
11/15/2010 12:32:54 PM PST
by
Tzimisce
(No thanks. We have enough government already. - The Tick)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-72 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson