Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kellis91789

I only heard the write in Miller votes were tossed on some article and were not to be counted. The number was not tossed.

My point, if supposedly you bend over backwards for the voter to have Murk only be close, why not also count Miller votes accidentally cast as write in fashion as well as the regular way if the intention was to vote Miller and that can be determined?


57 posted on 11/16/2010 8:57:01 PM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: A CA Guy

I agree that if the write-ins are being counted based on “intent” then any write-ins for Miller should certainly count. I just have not seen any article with any numbers about whether there were any such write-ins or not.

I can even see why somebody would write-in Joe Miller. After all, the write-in ballots will all be visually inspected, whereas machine counted ballots might have their counts diddled with. Or ... some voters might have thought it would be cute for Murkowski to think all the write-ins must be for her, only to be embarrassed during the actual counting.


58 posted on 11/16/2010 9:07:49 PM PST by Kellis91789 (There's a reason the mascot of the Democratic Party is a jackass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson