I’m not sure what they are trying to do with this, but I’ve had documents notarized in one state and recognized in other states - off the top of my head, I think notarized in about 8 states, and recognized in about 7 receiving states. You still have to comply with receiving state requirements as to number of witnesses, and in a few rare cases, form, but I’ve never seen the problem that they purport to want to solve.
You may have, but if it were in your interest to contest an electronic signature with an electronic notarial affixed, there is no recourse. How can you even be sure the signor or the notary are true persons and have actually met and actually proved the document(s) in question?
The actual problem comes from electronically affixing notary seals. There is no way to know 100% who has witnessed what or when. A signature can be placed at anytime on a scanned document with a seal applied also at any time. One could retrieve a copy of an electronic document today and affix any seals or signatures backdated to any time in the past.
If banksters are in favor of HR3808, you can believe there’s an underlying motive to cover some filthy ass.
If Congress passes this knowing the stakes for the rule of law, they will prove to be complicit the banks’ fraud, corruption, forgeries, and my trust for either institution will have completely vanished..
I can't be sure either but I have a hunch it might be a stepping stone to MERS II.
All your land records are belong to us.
They cannot be contested and resistance is futile.
Welcome to America, Inc.