To: giant sable
2 posted on
11/17/2010 9:56:58 AM PST by
rarestia
(It's time to water the Tree of Liberty.)
To: giant sable
Luckily for the U.S., we have a pro-business, pro-entrepreneur President!
Right?
3 posted on
11/17/2010 10:01:51 AM PST by
SonOfDarkSkies
(Obama: Traitor, Trojan Horse, Financial Terrorist!)
To: giant sable
Yeh and guess what they don’t have in any of those countries? You guessed it. Unions. The US could easily re-industrialize if we could get rid of the unions.
To: giant sable
5 posted on
11/17/2010 10:04:00 AM PST by
tutstar
To: giant sable
Interesting essay. One of the points being made is that the Supply-and-Demand paradigm has broken done because there is too much supply and not enough demand. I think there is something to this -- a few years ago I saw a number of newspaper articles about people who owned large houses, yet still had to rent out storage units, because they just had too much "stuff". Now, when things are tight, I think a lot of people are thinking that rampant consumerism isn't what they want.
I may have to go re-read this classic:
To: giant sable
How about throwing us a little dog biscuit on what this is about, why we should follow the link or what you think about it. If it wasn't a Forbes link I would have thought it was a Pimp My Blog post.
10 posted on
11/17/2010 10:27:51 AM PST by
KarlInOhio
(Dems' response to 11/2: Do not go gentle into that new day,Rage,rage against the coming of the dawn!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson