Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: speciallybland

Not to hijack the thread, but I wonder how the thinking Alaskans that voted for the cow feel about that vote now that it looks like earmarks are going to be cut-off, anyway?


29 posted on 11/17/2010 7:29:23 PM PST by PhiloBedo (You gotta roll with the punches and get with what's real.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PhiloBedo
"earmarks are going to be cut-off"

Earmarks? That's penny ante.

We're talking federal loan guarantees for the pipeline and revenue sharing with the state on royalties from drilling the OCS.

45 posted on 11/17/2010 7:50:59 PM PST by Ben Ficklin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

To: PhiloBedo

Unfortunately, the “earmark ban” is a sham. It is non-binding and voluntary. It in no way prohibits earmarks.


64 posted on 11/18/2010 11:24:27 AM PST by RWNut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson