Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Rightly Biased
so you see my point?

No.

There are many posters on this thread who agree with Chuzzlewit, and are defending their position. Including me.

I think Chuzzlewit just didn't express him(her)self completely enough.

It's not that they are searching babies, it's that they aren't searching the terrorists.

Those who think we should completely 'ban' any patdowns or body cavity searches, because TSA is randomly picking OBVIOUS NON TERRORISTS to search is missing the point.

Sure, something needs to be done to alleviate this unneeded touching of small children (and nuns, and old men in wheelchairs), but trying to ban ALL searching isn't going to protect us.

136 posted on 11/18/2010 12:05:37 PM PST by UCANSEE2 (Lame and ill-informed post)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 112 | View Replies ]


To: UCANSEE2

It was SARCASM UCANSEE2

How can anyone defend ignoring the 4th ammendment?

Where is the probable cause in searching this mother? Where is the probable cause in searching a toddler?

If I recall what Chuzzlewit said was something like we need to get over it.

Well I am not going to get over it.

And I am not going to allow my children and wife to be gaped at or groped by the federal government.

I don’t personally blame those working on the front lines for the TSA but it goes much higher than that.

The fourth ammendment it might do you good to read it as well.


145 posted on 11/18/2010 12:15:11 PM PST by Rightly Biased (Do you know how awkward it is to have a political argument with a naked man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2; Chuzzlewit

“oh the absolute horror !!!

they might touch my privy parts?

how about you people getting some perspective.”

___________________________________________________
It seems to me that Chuzzlewit didn’t say a thing about not searching terrorists. It seems to me that Chuzzlewit thinks we need to get some perspective about the TSA touching women and men in a very wrong way without consent or cause

Your shilling for Chuzzlewit is futile at best.

Let Chuzzlewit defend his or herself.

From what was posted not what they “meant to say”


149 posted on 11/18/2010 12:23:56 PM PST by Rightly Biased (Do you know how awkward it is to have a political argument with a naked man?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

To: UCANSEE2; Chuzzlewit

This is what he actually said:

To: FS11
oh the absolute horror !!!

they might touch my privy parts?

how about you people getting some perspective.

this is mass hysteria. I’m sick and tired of it.. Drudge is a strange dude, seems to have a hang up in this area.. This whole thing was “drudged” up by him.

6 posted on November 18, 2010 11:55:51 AM EST by Chuzzlewit

Don’t blame others if they reacted to the above. Should we have read his mind? Perhaps you were able to, so why didn’t you read ours as well?


150 posted on 11/18/2010 12:25:13 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson