Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: My Favorite Headache
How does one “move the country forward”? In the center’s report, Podesta explains that Obama can use executive orders, rulemaking, and even the armed forces “to accomplish important change” and that such means “should not be underestimated.”

The fact that most of our Armed Forces know that they swore to defend the Constitution, not Obama "should not be underestimated."

Nor should our growing disgust at what these communists are trying to force upon us.

79 posted on 11/18/2010 10:39:07 AM PST by Allegra (Pablo is very wily.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Allegra

Most of them who took that oath will not defy orders they pretty much know are given by the leader of a coup who took over the office of POTUS without ever even having been lawfully declared the winner of the electoral vote, much less “qualifying” by Jan 20, 2009 as required by the Constitution in order for a President elect to be given the presidential powers including that of CINC.

We have 3 military officers who were willing to balk on taking those orders, and all 3 either have been or are in the process of being snuffed out.

I believe we have the finest men and women in the world in our military, but their consciences have been seared so that they no longer believe it is RIGHT to do what it actually takes to defend the Constitution as they swore to do in their officer’s oath. If the military leadership can castrate our officers’ CONSCIENCES, so our officers truly believe it is WRONG to demand that the Article 92 elements be obeyed, then a usurper never has to worry that our officers will do en masse what Lakin has done.

I’ve asked military people all over the place exactly HOW the military officers would keep their oaths to protect and defend the Constitution if somebody like Fidel Castro illegally took over the presidency. What route would be available, that couldn’t be snuffed out by Castro’s chosen leadership? To this date I have not received an answer for HOW it could be done. The only way it could be done is if the officer rose en masse and defied orders, which would still make them vulnerable to court-martial.

How many officers do you think are willing to violate both their conscience and military law in order to uphold their oaths?


102 posted on 11/18/2010 10:52:59 AM PST by butterdezillion (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson