Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Coburn to McCain: Cutting defense is not 'isolationist'
Foreign Policy ^ | 11/18/10 | Josh Rogin

Posted on 11/18/2010 12:28:08 PM PST by Bokababe

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last
To: Bokababe

“McCain backs off, agrees that there is waste, but then says the waste should be “cut but reinvested”. McCain has built his entire career as an internationalist — of course he’s going to want the $$$ “reinvested” — which is the same effect as no cuts at all!”

If the waste was reinvested to protect our borders that would be a good way of agreeing with McCain and knocking him at the same time.


41 posted on 11/18/2010 2:41:57 PM PST by ari-freedom (Islam is at war against America, while America is at the mall.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom
"But we need to project power all over the world to protect our interests."

We have 10K ICBMs pointed right at Russia. Believe me, we don't need 60K or more troops stationed in Germany to project force. Did those troops keep Russia out of Georgia?

Korea can defend Korea. What precisely is our interest in keeping North Korea out of South Korea? It's not like South Korea is a big consumer of US goods, thanks to their own protectionist trade agreements with us (ones that we happily sign).

After WWII, we had a moral obligation to protect Japan. That was 65 years ago - literally a lifetime ago. Let Japan rearm if they're worried about China.

We can no longer afford to provide defense for the US homeland, as well as nations abroad. That is our new financial reality. We shouldn't ignore it. That's not going to make the problem go away.

42 posted on 11/18/2010 2:50:35 PM PST by OldDeckHand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: ari-freedom

They can pay for their own protection. They can cut some entitlements and fund their own military.

We’re broke.


43 posted on 11/18/2010 2:54:26 PM PST by WOBBLY BOB ( "I don't want the majority if we don't stand for something"- Jim Demint)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: La Enchiladita
Then I recommend reading the Constitution and learning what expenditures it provides for: defense and defense only.

True, but how many people here are willing to hand over their Social Security checks so that the DOD can have carte blanche forever?

It's time to get real. We're broke and something has to give. And I don't believe for a second that every DOD dollar is well-spent and not subject to waste.

44 posted on 11/18/2010 4:05:13 PM PST by Bokababe (Save Christian Kosovo! http://www.savekosovo.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Arthur Wildfire! March; Berosus; bigheadfred; ColdOne; Convert from ECUSA; Delacon; ...

45 posted on 11/18/2010 6:57:06 PM PST by SunkenCiv (The 2nd Amendment follows right behind the 1st because some people are hard of hearing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-45 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson