Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Sarah Palin Shouldn’t Run (She'd do better promoting conservatism on TV, not as President)
National Review ^ | 11/19/2010 | Mona Charen

Posted on 11/19/2010 6:50:35 AM PST by WebFocus

By telling Barbara Walters that she thinks she can defeat President Obama, Sarah Palin has dimmed hopes cherished by sensible Republicans that she might decide against a run for the White House in 2012. Here are just some of the reasons she should not run.

The Republican nominee should be someone with a vast and impressive record in government and the private sector. Voters chose a novice with plenty of star power in 2008 and will be inclined to swing strongly in the other direction in 2012. Americans will be looking for sober competence, managerial skill, and maturity — not sizzle and flash.

After the 2008 campaign revealed her substantive weaknesses, Palin was advised by those who admired her natural gifts to bone up on policy and devote herself to governing Alaska successfully. Instead, she quit her job as governor after two and a half years, published a book (another is due next week), and seemed to chase money and empty celebrity. Now, rather than being able to highlight the accomplishments of Sarah Palin’s Alaska, we get Sarah Palin’s Alaska, another cheesy entrant in the reality-show genre. She’d so much rather be out dog sledding than in some “dull political office,” she tells the audience. File that.

It’s true. She is wildly popular with a swath of the Republican electorate. And, as a conservative woman politician told me, political consultants (who get paid the big bucks, win or lose) will doubtless descend upon her with game plans showing how she can win in Iowa and then cruise to the nomination. Maybe. But the general election would be a problem, since 53 percent of independent voters view Palin unfavorably along with 81 percent of Democrats, according to a recent Gallup poll.

There is no denying that Sarah Palin has been harshly, sometimes even brutally, treated by the press and the entertainment gaggle. But any prominent Republican must expect and be able to transcend that. Palin compares herself to Reagan. But Reagan didn’t mud-wrestle with the press. Palin seems consumed and obsessed by it, as her rapid Twitter finger attests, and thus she encourages the sniping. She should be presiding over meetings on oil and gas leases in the North Slope, or devising alternatives to Obamacare. Every public spat with Dave Letterman or Politico, or the “lamestream media,” or (God help us) Levi Johnston, diminishes her.

Speaking of television, have you watched “Dancing with the Stars”? Calling the show cheesy would be too generous. Perhaps the former governor should not be blamed for the decisions of her adult daughter. Yet there in the audience we see Sarah and Todd Palin, mugging for the camera and cheering on their unwed-mother daughter as she bumps and grinds to the tune of “Mamma Told Me Not To Come.” Her parents had advised her, the 20-year-old Bristol told an interviewer, that she had to stay “in character” if she expected to win. Being “in character” evidently meant descending to the vulgarity that DWTS peddles on a weekly basis. The mama grizzly was apparently unfazed by, or — equally disturbingly — unaware of, the indignity. And she is supposed to be a conservative culture warrior?

Voters prize judgment, above all, in a presidential candidate. Some of Sarah Palin’s 2010 endorsements were sound and arguably helpful. Others betrayed flightiness and recklessness. Tom Tancredo, Palin’s choice for governor of Colorado, has ridden his anti-immigration hobby-horse in a style perfectly suited to alienate Hispanic voters (describing Miami, for example, as a “Third World city”). Her endorsement of Christine O’Donnell was irresponsible and damaging, losing a seat that would otherwise have been a Republican pick-up. Of course, O’Donnell received an absurdly disproportionate amount of ink and attention during the race (the liberal press naturally seizes upon any opportunity to make conservatives look kooky), but Palin should have anticipated that. Besides, this one cannot be laid at the feet of the biased media. O’Donnell was a thoroughly unqualified candidate.

Palin has many strengths. I admire her fortitude and her principles. Her ability to connect with a crowd is something most politicians can only dream of. I will always remember her 2008 convention speech as a rollicking star turn. She would be terrific as a talk-show host — the new Oprah.

But a presidential candidate? Someone to convince critical independent voters that Republicans can govern successfully? Absolutely not.

— Mona Charen is a nationally syndicated columnist.


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012; afraidisromney; backstabberromney; charen; charen4romney; charen4romneycare; cowardlyromney; cowardromney; hidingromney; operationleper4mitt; palin; pimpingromney; pimpromney; pimpromneyhere; pimpromneynow; presidency; romneycare; saboteurromney; sarahpalin; timidromney
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 601-603 next last

1 posted on 11/19/2010 6:50:41 AM PST by WebFocus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

Mona Charen doesn’t want Palin to run because Palin would wump the Mittster’s arse.


2 posted on 11/19/2010 6:52:18 AM PST by dirtboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus
Charen is wrong:



What do you mean you’re not sure she can govern? Have a look at this and don’t tell me she can’t govern:


Governor Sarah Palin’s Accomplishments that garnished her a whopping 92% approval rating:

Energy Independence, Development, and Environmental Stewardship

*Governor Palin’s cornerstone accomplishment is AGIA (Alaska Gasline Inducement Act). During the Palin administration, TransCanada and Exxon formed an alliance to build a natural gas pipeline from Alaska to the Lower 48. Under Governor Palin’s governance, the project was expanded and revised from what previous governors had proposed with an open policy process for the Alaskan people. More progress was made on this effort than in the previous 30 years. This is the largest private sector infrastructure project in North American history and helps put us on the path to energy independence.

*Governor Palin’s administration opened up drilling for oil and natural gas at Pt. Thompson for the first time in decades.

*Governor Palin created the Alaska’s Petroleum Integrity Office to oversee all aspects of energy development and to make sure oilfield equipment was safe to operate and a Climate Change Subcabinet to comprehensively and honestly evaluate climate change.

Fiscal Conservatism

*Governor Palin reduced earmark requests for the state of Alaska by 80% during her administration, requesting only earmarks that would benefit the country as a whole.

* Governor Palin reduced spending in her budget for Fiscal Year 2010 by more than one billion dollars from the previous governor’s Fiscal Year 2007 budget, a 9.5% real reduction in spending. Her FY2010 budget was $10.57 billion compared to Governor Murkowski’s FY2007 budget of nearly $11.7 billion. At the same time, she fulfilled her campaign promise to forward fund education, allowing districts greater flexibility and predictability in their planning.

*Governor Palin opposed much of the “stimulus”, wanting only to accept 55% of the money allocated to Alaska, specifically only dollars dedicated to infrastructure [projects. Although the Alaskan legislature ultimately overturned her veto, she stood firm on her commitment to help Alaska to become more self-sufficient while not adding to not add to the skyrocketing national debt.

* Governor Palin invested $5 billion in state savings.

Walking the Walk on Fiscal Responsibility

*Governor Palin sold the private jet purchased by the previous governor. She state it was an unnecessary financial burden on the state and was unable to land on many of the state’s landing strips.

* To cut costs that would be incurred by continuing to use a personal driver like previous governors, the governor drove herself from Wasilla to her office in Anchorage. She also dismissed the governor’s personal chef stationed in Juneau, Alaska’s capital.

* Governor Palin accepted less state per diem for herself and her family than her predecessors even though she had a larger family.

10th Amendment Advocacy/Promotion of State Constitution

*Showing that she is a strong supporter of the 10th amendment, Governor Palin advocated for the sovereignty of the state of Alaska.

*Governor Palin’s administration sued the federal government for placing the polar bear on the endangered species list, as this restriction affected energy development which would increase energy costs.

*A Constitutionalist, Governor Palin signed Alaska’s Clear and Equitable Share (ACES) bill into law. The Alaska constitution states that the Alaskan people own the oil and other resources. This law ensures that the “owners”, the people of Alaska, receive a clear and equitable share of oil profits.

National Defense/Veterans

*Governor Palin supported ground-based missile defense Ft Greely and other Alaskan Bases around to protect America from America’s enemies. She criticized the Obama administration for cuts that they made to this national defense system.

*Governor Palin, with Senators Murkowski and Begich, fought for retirement benefits from the federal government that were due to the Alaska Territorial Guard members who fought during World War II. These benefits were eventually rewarded to these veterans by the federal government.

* Governor Palin visited Alaskan soldiers in Kosovo and Kuwait.

Transparency/Anti-Corruption

*Governor Palin signed bipartisan ethics reform legislation into law that helped to hold both the legislative and executive branches accountable.

*Governor Palin put the state checkbook online, allowing all constituents to see how state money was being spent.

Health Care

*Governor Palin introduced health care transparency legislation which aimed at putting information in the hands of consumers about cost and quality of health care as a way to make health care consumer driven and accessible.

Sanctity and Dignity of All Life

* Governor Palin strongly supported both parental consent and parental notification legislation.

*Governor Palin increased educational funding for special needs’ children.

*Governor Palin implemented the Senior Benefits Program to support low income seniors.

Positions Held while Governor

* Chairman of the Interstate Oil and Gas Compact Commission.

*Vice Chair of the National Governors Association Natural Resource Committee.

* She served as chair of the Alaska Conservation Commission, which regulates Alaska’s most valuable non-renewable resources: oil and gas. She was elected by her peers to serve as president of the Alaska Conference of Mayors. In this role, she worked with local, state and federal officials to promote solutions to the needs of Alaska’s communities.

She exposed legal violations and conflicts of interest of Alaska Republican leaders, including the former state Attorney General and the State GOP Chairman (who was also an Oil & Gas Commissioner), who was doing work for the party on public time and supplying a lobbyist with a sensitive e-mail. Several went to jail.

Governor Palin signed several pieces of legislation and resolutions during July 2009. They were:

•SB-125: Encourage aerospace development in AK
•SB-177: Extend sunset for sport fishing guides and address harvest data collection
•Pro-energy development and missile defense resolutions

HJR-27: Alaska a Sovereign State
HJR-25: Hydro-Electric a Renewable Resource
HJR-28: Oppose Federal Restriction on Oil and Gas Development
HJR-12: Support Missile Defense System
•SB-88: Power cost equalization
•Defending Second Amendment rights.

SB-201: Extends Concealed Carry Permit Expiration to 5 Years from Birthday
HJR-17: Urges Congress not to pass HR-45.The federal legislation would put burdensome licensing and registration controls on individual gun owners.
SJR-10: Urges Congress to pass S-371. The legislation was to ensure that citizens of each state who are licensed or authorized by their home state to carry a concealed weapon, could do so in another state as long as they comply with the laws of that state.
SJR-3: The resolution expresses support to Congress for repealing the ban on carrying a firearm on National Park Service lands.
•SB-3 Requiring information sharing between two agencies.
•HRJ-19 Supports requirement of escort for loaded tankers traversing Prince William Sound.
•The Governor appointed 29 people to boards, commissions and councils and made three judicial appointments between July 6, 2009 and July 26, 2009.

Governor Palin’s total appointments for 2009 was123, including 116 to boards, commissions and councils, five judicial appointments, one legislative and one attorney general. Governor Palin averaged one appointment every 1.67 days during 2009.
•The Governor vetoed $28.6 million in stimulus money that would have involved federal interference with the state of Alaska.
Governor Palin signed bills removing experience caps on teacher’s salaries and extending boat safety programs.

Governor Palin signed legislation that gave struggling charter schools a one-year grace period to increase enrollments or integrate with other charter schools. She also signed legislation that authorizes Alaska “to enroll in the Interstate Compact on Educational Opportunity for Military Children.”

Governor Palin signed legislation granting birth certificates for stillborn babies

Governor Palin signed legislation authorizing the state to fund retirement benefits for Alaska Territorial Guard veterans. The federal government ceased funding benefits on April 1, 2009

Governor Palin signed legislation safeguarding student loans

Sarah Palin was Commander of the Alaska National Guard. Alaska is the first line of defense in our missile interceptor defense system. The 49th Missile Defense Battalion of the Alaska National Guard is the first line of defense unit that protects the entire nation from ballistic missile attacks. It’s on permanent active duty, unlike other Guard units in the United States. As governor of Alaska, Palin was briefed on highly classified military issues, homeland security, and counterterrorism daily.

Governor Palin was the commander in chief of the Alaska State Defense Force (ASDF), a federally recognized militia incorporated into Homeland Security’s counterterrorism plans.

38 posted on 11/16/2010 5:18:34 PM PST by Retired Intelligence Officer

3 posted on 11/19/2010 6:53:01 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus; pissant

I wondered when this would be posted. My money was on pissant. He must be still asleep on the Left coast.


4 posted on 11/19/2010 6:53:01 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (NPR: Air America with government funding to keep them alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

Well, it’s sure good to hear what the inside-the-beltway, Washington elite Republicans think!

Thank you National Review.

But shouldn’t you be preparing your Lisa Murkowski post election celebration?


5 posted on 11/19/2010 6:54:00 AM PST by t-dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus
"...sensible Republicans..."

LOL, aka RINOs.

6 posted on 11/19/2010 6:54:17 AM PST by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus
"By telling Barbara Walters that she thinks she can defeat President Obama, Sarah Palin has dimmed hopes cherished by sensible [RINO sellout] Republicans that she might decide against a run for the White House in 2012."

Fixed it.

7 posted on 11/19/2010 6:54:26 AM PST by avacado
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Which coast do you mean? The left coast, or the left coast on the right-hand side of the country?
8 posted on 11/19/2010 6:55:22 AM PST by Celtic Cross (I AM the Impeccable Hat. (AKA The Pope's Hat))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

Shut up, Mona, you RINO. You’re just jealous of Sarah Palin.


9 posted on 11/19/2010 6:55:29 AM PST by backwoods-engineer ("The Constitution is not an instrument for government to restrain the people..." -- Patrick Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus
So to be a “culture warrior” one must oppose anything so base and vulgar as DANCING on TV?

What the hell? Way to go out on a limb of condemnation of Palin as too far out there, and then talk about how “Dancing with the Star” is smut! LOL!

Wow did she ever jump the shark with that one!

10 posted on 11/19/2010 6:56:00 AM PST by allmendream (Tea Party did not send the GOP to D.C. to negotiate the terms of our surrender to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

Here are my reasons for not wanting Sarah to run in 2012:

1) She is a great educator in regard to conservative principles.

2) She keeps the national conversation focused - especially as it applies to keeping elected Republicans in line.

3) The Tea Party movement still has work to do and Sarah gets the national exposure.

4) If she waits for another election, she will fit into the Republican system of it being “her turn”.

5) Her family will be mostly grown up.


11 posted on 11/19/2010 6:56:39 AM PST by chickadee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: t-dude

Brought to you by the same establishment who gave us John McCain.


12 posted on 11/19/2010 6:56:55 AM PST by Rational Thought
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

I like Sarah Palin, a lot.

But she won’t be getting my vote in the primary.

Thune or Pence.

And Sarah will beat Obama just like Angle beat Reid. It isn’t gonna happen.


13 posted on 11/19/2010 6:57:08 AM PST by JRochelle (My predictions on 2/3/2010: It will be Thune/Rubio in '12.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus
Another Mitt-wit chimes in.

No thanks.
14 posted on 11/19/2010 6:57:50 AM PST by Antoninus (Fair warning: If Romney's the GOP nominee in 2012, I'm looking for a new party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trisham
Excellent Palin resume!

It'd be great if that were a poster image (jpg) or PDF that folks could download and forward to others, including independents and Palin hating liberals.

15 posted on 11/19/2010 6:58:37 AM PST by Cobra64
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus
The Republican nominee should be someone with a vast and impressive record in government and the private sector.

Gee, Mona, who would that be?

Juan McCain? That worked out so well for us last time, didn't it?

Mitt Romney? Do you really think that "Health Care in Massachusetts is not quite as FUBAR as ObamaCare" is a winning slogan?

Mike Huckabee? Juan McCain's mini-me plus a Willie Horton redux gives us the best of both worlds, doesn't it?

16 posted on 11/19/2010 6:58:41 AM PST by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

I agree with Charen overall. I don’t think Palin is qualified to be president. I’ll vote for almost anyone over Obama, including her, but millions of independent voters will not. Some Freepers are pretty unrealistic. Last time they banded around Duncan Hunter. Duncan who?


17 posted on 11/19/2010 6:58:51 AM PST by reaganaut1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

In a way, I have to agree with this. A lot of voters made the mistake of voting for someone without any merit, and they realize it. I know Palin was Governor and Mayor, but she did quit half way through her Governor term. Regardless of the reasons for it, this does not bode well for her.


18 posted on 11/19/2010 6:58:54 AM PST by Wee-Weed Up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

Sorry, Mona. You’re not One of Us. You don’t realize that we, the voters, will tell people who should run ... when we vote. Remember ol’ One Delegate Rudy Giuliani? I do.

You’ve never run for office, Mona, so don’t you dare tell us Sarah shouldn’t. It’s up to her and her family, and then it’s up to us, the voters, to tell her whether we think she should be our nominee.


19 posted on 11/19/2010 6:59:30 AM PST by Tax-chick (Global Warming: the first faith preached exclusively by hypocrites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

“The Republican nominee should be someone with a vast and impressive record in government and the private sector.”


20 posted on 11/19/2010 6:59:30 AM PST by TeachableMoment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus; allmendream; lonestar; trisham; Radagast the Fool; DefeatCorruption; Fast Moving Angel; ..
Charen out pimping for the RINO-Romney crowd, eh?

Looks like the "Stop Sarah" campaign is still in full swing!

21 posted on 11/19/2010 6:59:36 AM PST by Virginia Ridgerunner (Sarah Palin has crossed the Rubicon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Celtic Cross; pissant

He’s physically in the state of Washington. No other meaning intended.


22 posted on 11/19/2010 7:00:15 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (NPR: Air America with government funding to keep them alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

Where is Moana’s article about the usurper commie obama not running in 2012? I musta missed it.


23 posted on 11/19/2010 7:00:19 AM PST by biggredd1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

Now don’t get me wrong, I’d definitely vote for her. BUt the maina rgument is going to be, if she couldn’t handle it while governor, she can’t handle it as President. And the stupid masses will believe it.


24 posted on 11/19/2010 7:01:13 AM PST by Wee-Weed Up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

Pence and Thune - Indiana and SoDak - great men, waste of time. Presidential elections are like product marketing, unfortunately. Obama’s inaugural party will be bigger than the 2008 one.


25 posted on 11/19/2010 7:02:01 AM PST by major-pelham
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

Don’t you get it? If you don’t support Palin around here, you support Mitt Romney, John McCain and Lisa Murkowski. It doesn’t matter if you want Thune or Pence - because deep down inside, you secretly want Romney to win. /s


26 posted on 11/19/2010 7:02:43 AM PST by Dan Nunn (Support the NRA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner

It’s the same tired old stuff, this time from Charen.

I know that she wrote an article, I think in 2008, praising Romney.


27 posted on 11/19/2010 7:03:25 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus
"The Republican nominee should be someone with a vast and impressive record in government and the private sector."

Right, Mona! Like who?

All the folks in Government are lawyers and part of the problem.

People in the private sector who have impressive records usually have too much sense to run.

You folks in the chattering class, liberal AND conservative, have made politics a beauty contest. Who cares is a candidate is not photogenic or cannot debate well.

Does the candidate have wisdom and integrity?

Can they choose experienced, knowledgeable advisers & staff?

Do they UNDERSTAND and revere the US Constitution?

Do they know that they are accountable to the American people and to God?

28 posted on 11/19/2010 7:03:31 AM PST by BwanaNdege ("a comeuppance is due the arrogant elites" - Charles Krauthammer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Wee-Weed Up

I agree. All political decision-making should be organized around what the stupid masses will like best. Let’s just make Zero Dictator for Life. That will please quite a few stupid people, until La Raza (the new majority-minority) takes him out and puts in Hugo Chavez Parte Dos.

Anything but a conservative, right?


29 posted on 11/19/2010 7:04:33 AM PST by Tax-chick (Global Warming: the first faith preached exclusively by hypocrites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus
JMHO...

.... but I think it would be BEST for America, the Republic and Democracy — if the lame-stream media, dems, RINOs and certain “patriots” would just shut up and allow the long-established presidential primary process to unfold, and take it's natural course - with the best candidates emerging from the herd.

30 posted on 11/19/2010 7:05:02 AM PST by VRWCTexan (Those who forget history, are doomed to repeat it !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

Sad what’s happened to National Review. God, when I was a kid in the 1960s I LIVED for its every utterance. Now...


31 posted on 11/19/2010 7:06:12 AM PST by PaleoBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VRWCTexan

Wonder why these folks REALLY don’t want her to run? Savage says she cannot win.


32 posted on 11/19/2010 7:06:21 AM PST by Blue Turtle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

Mona is entitled to her opinion. It’s wrong. But she is entitled to it.


33 posted on 11/19/2010 7:07:03 AM PST by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Sarah isn’t going to get the nomination.

Too many people think just like you and me.

WE WANT A WINNER!


34 posted on 11/19/2010 7:09:29 AM PST by JRochelle (My predictions on 2/3/2010: It will be Thune/Rubio in '12.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

Palin might win against Obama; I would certainly vote for her given that choice. But I don’t want “mights” rather I want Obama out and while that motivation may well be a dominate feeling amongst the electorate come 2012, it does not mean they will vote for a candidate that many dislike as much or more than they do Obama. These voters may stay home and Obama continues to destroy the country. I agree with Charen, Palin can do much more as a spokesman, exemplar and public opinion leader than she can do as a candidate that might damn well lose. The country cannot afford that.


35 posted on 11/19/2010 7:10:26 AM PST by yetidog (/*)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle
And Sarah will beat Obama just like Angle beat Reid. It isn’t gonna happen.

I agree. I also like Sarah Palin, but with the amount of vilification and bad press that's she's received, although unfair, it is the way it is, a good many voters are turned off to her.

The role she's playing now suits her fine.

36 posted on 11/19/2010 7:10:54 AM PST by rochester_veteran ( http://RochesterConservative.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

I want a conservative to win. What are the odds that the RNC will nominate a real conservative. By the way, please tell me we don’t have to deal with that McLaim again.


37 posted on 11/19/2010 7:11:51 AM PST by discipler (How's that 'hope and change' working for 'ya? - RL)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JRochelle

I dont know who it will be, but they would be smart to get

PAUL RYAN ON THE TICKET! NOW HE’S A WINNER!


38 posted on 11/19/2010 7:12:16 AM PST by Texas4ever (God is in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: Virginia Ridgerunner; Diogenesis; Al B.; Clyde5445; onyx

Mona Charen, serious crush on Romney:

In National Review she wrote a column titled:

“A Second Look at Romney”

Just a sample of the quotes:

“But no one running is more impressive than Mitt Romney....

But then Romney has been masterful in everything he has attempted...

It is difficult to find any significant weakness in Romney. He is refreshingly articulate, exceedingly well prepared and self-disciplined, clearly an excellent manager with both private and government experience, happily married with a large, supportive family, and well within the mainstream of conservatism on every major issue. His nomination would not divide the base....

He is just the sort of candidate people complain that they never get.”

http://www.nationalreview.com/articles/223108/second-look-romney/mona-charen

Had enough? Reading her column on Romney made me want to spit up. It was worse than being groped by the TSA.

Diogenesis, quick...the Gold tooth


39 posted on 11/19/2010 7:12:25 AM PST by Brices Crossroads
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

Keep it up, Mona. Your readership diminishes with each koolaid-laced eruption.


40 posted on 11/19/2010 7:12:43 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Starve the beast. Save the liver!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Blue Turtle
We have primaries and elections to determine who can and who cannot win.

All this talk -- two years ahead of the event -- that Palin "cannot win" is just fear. These people do not want the establishment to be taken down, they do not want corruption rooted out, they do not want government to be smaller, and they do not want a return to the Constitution. They do not want Palin, because they are afraid she stands for all of these things. And so they say (in desperate hope) that she cannot win.

41 posted on 11/19/2010 7:12:52 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

Mona, you homely dumb broad, Reagan did not have to contend with the 24 hour news cycle, the internet, twitter, facebook or Bill Maher, and it’s dishonest to pretend otherwise. We have no idea how Mr. Reagan and Nancy would have responded to all the lies put out by the maniacs over at KOS and Huffpost. In fact, since the age of the internet, with the exception of George Bush (who is criticized by the Establishment Repubs for NOT fighting back!!!), all presidents have fought back at the media. Remember the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy, Mona? Oh, but Hillary went the Harvard Law School so that’s OK.

Did you read Sarah’s book? Because not only is it a wonderful read but she talks substantively about the issues she is interested in: American values, oil production, smaller government, etc. Empty celebrity, indeed!

And to insult the Palins by accusing them of “mugging” for the camera while watching their beautiful daughter dance on television is really low, Mona. Todd and Sarah are way too good-looking to have to “mug” for the cameras. What you missed was their beam of pride for a beloved child.

Lastly, I have a friend who has a famous name in England (she’s a classical actress on the London stage) who is currently competing in Great Britain’s “Dancing with the Stars.” She had no qualms about appearing on a show that is - after all - nothing more than a ballroom dancing competition.

You’ve got to get out more, Mona - as do other Establishment types - and learn something about popular culture and populism. In fact, why don’t you read a book by Camille Paglia who will explain it all to you. And SHE went to Yale so it’s OK for you to look her up.

Miss Marmelstein is not in a good mood anymore.


42 posted on 11/19/2010 7:13:23 AM PST by miss marmelstein
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
Mona Charen doesn’t want Palin to run because Palin would wump the Mittster’s arse.

That pretty much sums it up. Mona is clinging bitterly to her Rockefeller Republican (read : RINO) beliefs.

43 posted on 11/19/2010 7:14:51 AM PST by afnamvet (Patriots Rising)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cobra64

I hear you. I’ll get back to you.


44 posted on 11/19/2010 7:15:13 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

I think people might be missing something—Charen is speaking for an element inside “conservatism” that supported Obama last time out. It’s bad enough that they would opt for Romney (ugh) but when push comes to shove this group will back Obama again. Bank on it.


45 posted on 11/19/2010 7:16:09 AM PST by PaleoBob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan Nunn

Hey, if Thune or Pence win the nomination, they will undoubtedly get our support.

But NO ONE is attacking them and trying to convince them not to even run.

What’s wrong with letting the VOTERS decide who we want. This coordinated elitist attack is disgusting, and all the anti-Palin people on FR chiming in with it are going to catch some flack.

My suggestion to you is, start some pro Pence or Thune threads...talk up your guy...but quit the anti-Palin piling on.

Don’t you get it? The more you guys trash her the stronger she gets...which is why I believe she will win it all in a landslide.

Yes, she has a hill to climb, but that’s what campaigns are for.


46 posted on 11/19/2010 7:16:17 AM PST by t-dude
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus

I agree with Mona. I’d vote for Palin in the general over Obama or Hillary but in the primary, she ranks ahead of only the other 2008 candidates for me.


47 posted on 11/19/2010 7:16:28 AM PST by Padams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WebFocus
In contrast to the opinion of Smitten Mitten Moana, here's S.E. Cupp on Sarah Palin's Happiness.

IMHO, Mona your idea of "Presidential" is outmoded, gone with the wind. You see Mitty - the hair, the smile, the plastic image - and you swoon. Your word for the 2012 GOP POTUS candidate is "sensible". The rest of the Tea Party Nation's word for the 2012 GOP POTUS nominee is ...

AUTHENTIC(ally Conservative).

Sarah qualifies. Mitt does NOT.

48 posted on 11/19/2010 7:17:05 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (NPR: Air America with government funding to keep them alive)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
[ I don’t think Palin is qualified to be president. ]

So you think Carter, Reagan, Bush Sr., Clintoon, Bush Jr., or Obama is qualified to be President?..

What are you smoking?.. Nobody is actually qualified to be President..
Even past Presidents..

Every four years the national situation totally changes..
The best that be said is some are more up to the job than others..
That being said.. Most Republicans are for a Republic, but ALL democrats are for a democracy..

What do you want a Republic -OR- a Democracy.. you CANNOT HAVE BOTH..
----------------------------
Democracy is the road to socialism. -Karl Marx

Democracy is indispensable to socialism. The goal of socialism is communism. -V.I. Lenin

The meaning of peace is the absence of opposition to socialism .-Karl Marx

49 posted on 11/19/2010 7:17:05 AM PST by hosepipe (This propaganda has been edited to include some fully orbed hyperbole....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: trisham

BOOKMARK SARAH!! THANK YOU FOR INFO CONCENTRATED IN ONE PLACE!!


50 posted on 11/19/2010 7:17:34 AM PST by DrewsMum
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-150151-200 ... 601-603 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson