[dusttoyou]

mom, you can't have your cake and eat it too. Either the Speaker has special security needs or he doesn't. Which is it you prefer?

Regarding Steele, he is indefensible in every area with the exception here. For many other reasons Steele was a bad choice by RNC and needs to go. BUT “This” Speaker IS NOT getting special treatment different from every other Speaker of the House. That is fact. Apparently you mistook Steele's statement as if he was saying Bonhner was not getting special treatment compared to the procedures us citizens have to endure.

This whole charade is a yellow journalism hit piece by the NY Slimes, why are you buying into their BS?

[metmom]

mom, you can't have your cake and eat it too. Either the Speaker has special security needs or he doesn't. Which is it you prefer?

Do you nave reading comprehension issues? Is it really that bad? Is there something about not objecting to to his security detail that you don't get?

Go back and read my posts 51, 65, 83, 142, and 143.

How many times do I have to post that it's not Boehner's security detail that I object to or commented on?

I'M NOT TALKING ABOUT OR OBJECTING TO HIS NEED FOR SECURITY!!!!!

Reread the posts!!!

Objectively.

What they say, not what you've already decided that they say.

[DJ MacWoW]

Try reading my post 144. Does that make the objection to STEEL”S statement and his disconnect clearer?