These statutes bring up an interesting dichotomy in which right trumps another. I think that we can all agree that the Constitution is supposed to protect the individual from the government. However, these statutes pretty much state that not only is the government prohibited from denying constitutionally guaranteed rights, but individuals can't do it either. However, which is the trumping right? The G-d given right to private property, which is a requirement to be free and independent, or the 2nd Amendment? Does a private property owner have the right to discriminate based on behavior? Can a private business legally say you can't carry a gun on his property, and that if you wish to carry, don't go there.
I am torn by this. But deep down, I believe that the right to personal property should trump an individual's right to carry a weapon, when that person who wants to carry is on that property owner's property.
Mark