[bgill]

Wait, please clarify as this doesn’t make sense:

“zero was removed from the centre of the image”

“zero was superimposed between them”

---

About the wall, are you talking about the lighter stone to the left of Gramps being damaged? There is a gray blob of mortar on the bottom of that lighter damaged stone which isn’t in the “today” picture. Also, the stones/mortar lines aren’t lined up the same as can be seen in the top stone and the one two down from it lining up next to Toots but they are staggered in the “today” picture. That can’t be the same section of wall.

[Fred Nerks]

That can’t be the same section of wall.

STEP BY STEP:

The image of the three of them looked fake.

I asked PhilDragoo to remove zero, to see how the two oldies fitted together.

In doing so, the clothes of the oldies were 'damaged'

I drew your attention to the 'poor workmanship' of the wall

by showing you how neat and tidy...and PERFECT the wall was...I have other images...THERE IS NOWHERE IN THAT WALL which looks so AWFUL!

I thought it would be OBVIOUS that who-ever 'created' the image of the THREE of them, DAMAGED THE IMAGE OF THE WALL in that process.

NOTE: it runs straight along an entire section as far as the eye can see...yet behind Stanley Armour in the FAKE image, there's a huge DIP.

YOU WROTE:

Wait, please clarify as this doesn’t make sense:

“zero was removed from the centre of the image”

TO SHOW THAT HE DIDN'T BELONG THERE!

“zero was superimposed between them”

AND THAT'S WHY WE TOOK HIM OUT!